期刊文献+

不同转运方式新生儿临床及转归对比分析 被引量:7

Comparative analysis of clinical characteristics and outcome of neonates transferred by different
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同转运方式新生儿临床及转归情况。方法对2009年7月至2010年7月转至青岛大学医学院新生儿重症监护室(neonatal intensive care unit,NICU)1027例新生儿行前瞻性分析。按转运方式不同分双程转运、求助医院单程转运和家属单程转运。比较三组患儿入院情况、院前急救措施和出院情况等。计量资料行X^2检验、计数资料行方差分析、转归情况行Mann Whitney U检验统计学处理。结果双程转运、求助医院单程转运和家属单程转运患儿人院年龄中位数是0.46d,0.33d,5d;双程转运和求助医院单程转运的患儿胎龄、出生体质量小于家属单程转运,然而病情危重程度重于家属单程转运,并且住院花费高于家属单程转运,差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.05);除保暖措施,余急救措施各组差异均有统计学意义(X^2=96.855—103.863,P〈0.05);家属单程转运治愈好转出院百分率最高,各组转归情况差异具有统计学意义(Z=-1.987~-5.347,P〈0.05)。结论双程转运和求助医院单程转运新生儿的入院年龄小、出生体质量低、胎龄小、病情重,住院花费高且治愈好转出院百分率低。 Objective To explore the clinical characteristics and outcome of neonates transferred by different ways. Method A total of 1 027 neonates transferred to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of our hospital from July 2009 to July 2010 were analyzed prospectively. They were divided into three groups: twoway transport(TWT), hospital-aided one-way transport(HAT) and self-help one-way transport(SHT). The conditions at admission and discharge and pre-hospital care of the neonates were compared between the groups. The data were statistically analyzed with square tests, variance analysis and Mann Whitney U test. Results The median ages of TWT, HAT, and SHT groups at admission were 0.46 d, 0.33 d and 5 d respectively. The TWT and HAT neonates had smaller gestational age and birth weight than SHT ones, had more severe conditions and cost more, and the differences were significant ( P 〈 0.05 ). Significant differ- ences existed in all emergency treatment except in warming measures( X2 =96. 855 -103. 863, P 〈 0.05). The cure percentage at discharge was the highest in SHT group, and differences in treatment results of three groups were significant (Z = - 1. 987 to - 5. 347, P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusions The TWT and HAT neonates have smaller gestational age, ages at admission and birth weight than SHT ones, have more severe condi- tions, cost more and lower cure percentage at discharge than SHT ones.
出处 《中华急诊医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第5期477-480,共4页 Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine
基金 青岛市公共领域科技支撑计划项目(09-1-1-16-nsh)
关键词 新生婴儿 转运网络 新生儿重症监护室 预后 Newborn infant Transport network Neonatal intensive care unit Outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Fenton AC, Leslie A, Skeoch CH. Optimising neonatal transfer [J].Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed,2004,89 ( 3 ) : F215-F219.
  • 2覃世文,李华强,史源,曾小奇.新生患儿转运网络的建立及其临床意义[J].第三军医大学学报,2003,25(13):1202-1203. 被引量:2
  • 3Richardson DK, Gray JE, Mccormick MC, et al. Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology: a physiologic severity index for neonatal intensive care[ J]. Pediatrics,1993,91 (3) :617-623.
  • 4中华医学会急诊学分会儿科学组,中华医学会儿科学分会急诊学组,新生儿学组.新生儿危重病例评分法(草案)[J].现代实用医学,2003,15(6):394-394. 被引量:16
  • 5杨于嘉.求助医院转运前的工作任务[J].小儿急救医学,2001,8(2):67-69. 被引量:14
  • 6赵玉歧,肖敏,何淑敏,张德生.危重症新生儿转诊转运的有关问题[J].中国全科医学,2004,7(13):994-995. 被引量:6
  • 7张爱梅,陈雪莉,刘明耀,王俊怡.区域性危重新生儿转运的进展[J].医学综述,2010,16(13):1998-2001. 被引量:19
  • 8Spector JM, Villanueva HS, Brito ME, et al. Improving outcomes of transported newborns in Panama : impact of a nationwide neonatal provider education program [ J ]. J Perinatol, 2009,29 ( 7 ) : 512- 516.
  • 9ONeill N, Howlett AA. Evaluation of the impact of the S. T. A. B. L.E. Program on the pretransport care of the neonate[ J]. Neonatal Netw ,2007,26 ( 3 ) : 153-159.
  • 10Taylor tl N, Price-Douglas W. The S. T. A. B. L. E, Program: Post-Resuscitation/ Pre-Transport stabilization care of sick infants [ J ]. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs,2008,22 ( 2 ) : 159-165.

二级参考文献60

共引文献98

同被引文献62

引证文献7

二级引证文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部