摘要
目的初步分析主症不同赋分的中医证候疗效评价结果的差异及产生差异的原因。方法基于既往研究的86个中药研究数据库,以分级疗效一致性和是否存在统计学差异为指标,分析主症权重分别为1、2、3的3种赋分方案间中医证候疗效评价结果的差异,并对疗效判定结果不一致的病例主症改善情况进行分析。结果 86个数据库3种赋分方案间疗效不同率为(14.85±6.33)%,且3种赋分方案间疗效有统计学差异的数据库比例为11.63%。结论主症改善的程度是产生差异的原因,在中医证候疗效评价标准中,应增加主症改善程度的规定。
AIM To analyze the impact of different scoring methods of main symptoms on traditional Chinese medicine(TCM) syndrome assessment.METHODS Based on previous study of 86 Chinese traditional medicine database,three scoring methods were used according to the different weight of main symptoms,and the curative efficacies of TCM syndrome were evaluated.RESULTS The different rate of the curative efficacies of three scoring methods was(14.85±6.33)%,and statistically significant ratio of the curative efficacies was 11.63%.CONCLUSION The improvement degree of TCM main symptoms is the main reason for the differences of the curative efficacies.In TCM syndrome assessment standard,the improvement degree of main symptoms should be added.
出处
《中国新药与临床杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2011年第4期309-312,共4页
Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical Remedies
基金
贵州省中药现代化科技产业研究开发专项项目"国家药物(中药)临床试验机构建设"(黔科合中药专字[2007]5001号)