期刊文献+

改良Alvarado评分对急性阑尾炎的诊断价值分析 被引量:2

Application of modified Alvarado scoring system in the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨改良Alvarado评分对急性阑尾炎诊断和治疗价值.方法 回顾我院自1985年1月至2009年12月间收治的行阑尾切除术并有完整临床资料的患者1637例,计算改良Alvarado评分,比较评分≥7分患者(833例)及<7分患者(804例)的阴性切除率;计算评分的阳性预测率;并对评分结果和病理诊断进行相关分析.结果 评分≥7分患者阴性切除率明显低于评分〈7分患者,差异有统计学意义;评分阳性预测率为93.8%;评分分值和病理分型成正相关(r=0.637,P〈0.01).结论 应用改良Alvarado评分能提高急性阑尾炎的诊断率,显著降低阴性阑尾切除率. Objective To study the application of Alvarado scoring system in the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. Methods The dada of the Alvarado scores of 1637 patients with acute appendicitis who were admitted to our hospital and underwent appendectomy between January 1985 and December 2009 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups in terms of the score:≥7 group( n = 833 )and 〈 7 group( n = 804). The negative resection rate was compared between the two groups. Validity of scoring system was assessed by calculating the positive predictive value. The correlation of the Alvarado scores and pathological type was analyzed. Results There was significant difference in the negative resection rate between two groups. The positive predictive value was 93.8%. The correlation between the Alvarado scores and pathological type was positive( r =0.637 ,P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion The application of Alvarado scoring system improves diagnostic accuracy of acute appendicitis and reduces the negative resection rate.
出处 《临床外科杂志》 2011年第4期244-245,共2页 Journal of Clinical Surgery
关键词 Alvarado评分 阑尾炎 阑尾切除术 Alvarado score system acute appendicitis appendectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1Bhopal FG,Khan JS,Iqbal M.Surgical audit of acute appendicitis[J].J Coll Physicians Surg Pak,1999,9(5):223-226.
  • 2Talwar S,Talwar R,Prasad P.Continuing diagnostic challenge of acute appendicitis:evaluation through modified alvarado score:comment[J].Aust N Z J Surg,1999,69(11):821-822.
  • 3Alvarado A.A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis[J].Ann Emerg Med,1986,15(5):557-564.
  • 4Kalan M,Talbot D,Cunliffe WJ,et al.Evaluation of modified Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis:a prospective study[J].Ann R Cou Surg Engl,1994,76(6):418-419.

同被引文献26

  • 1Macaluso CR, McNamara RM. Evaluation and man-agement of acute abdominal pain in the emergencydepartment. Int ] Gen Med 2012; 5: 789-797 [PMID:23055768 DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S25936].
  • 2Howell JM, Eddy OL, Lukens TW, Thiessen ME,Weingart SD, Decker WW. Clinical policy: Criti-cal issues in the evaluation and management ofemergency department patients with suspected ap-pendicitis. Ann Emerg Med 2010; 55: 71-116 [PMID:20116016 DOI: 10.1016/j,annemergmed.2009.10.004].
  • 3Alvarado A. A practical score for the early di-agnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med1986; 15: 557-564 [PMID: 3963537 DOI: 10.1016/S0196-0644(86)80993-3].
  • 4Talwar S, Talwar R, Prasad P. Continuing diag-nostic challenge of acute appendicitis: evaluationthrough modified alvarado score: comment. AustNZ] Surg 1999; 69: 821-822 [PMID: 10553974 DOI:10.1046/j.l440-1622.1999.01703.x].
  • 5Kalan M, Talbot Dr Cunliffe WJ, Rich AJ. Evaluationof the modified Alvarado score in the diagnosis ofacute appendicitis: a prospective study. Ann R CollSurg Engl 1994; 76: 418-419 [PMID: 7702329].
  • 6Sauerland S, Agresta F, Bergamaschi R, Borzel-lino G, Budzynski A, Champault G, Fingerhut A,Isla A, Johansson M, Lundorff P, Navez B, Saad S,Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopy for abdominal emer-gencies: evidence-based guidelines of the EuropeanAssociation for Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc2006; 20: 14-29 [PMID: 16247571 DOI: 10.1007/S00464-005-0564-0].
  • 7李铎,刘金洪,康春博,李爱民,陈秀峰,李旭斌,林大鹏,王立敏,王佳慧.经脐单孔腹腔镜急腹症探查术的单一中心回顾性分析.中国微创外科杂志2013, 13:127-130.
  • 8Dunker MS, Bemelman WA, Slors JF, van Dui-jvendijk P, Gouma DJ. Functional outcome, qualityof life, body image, and cosmesis in patients afterlaparoscopic-assisted and conventional restorativeproctocolectomy: a comparative study. Dis ColonRectum 2001; 44: 1800-1807 [PMID: 11742165 DOI:10.1007/BF02234458].
  • 9Stefanidis D, Richardson WS, Chang L, Earle DB,Fanelli RD. The role of diagnostic laparoscopy foracute abdominal conditions: an evidence-based re-view. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 16-23 [PMID: 18814014DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-0103-x].
  • 10McKay R, Shepherd J. The use of the clinical scoringsystem by Alvarado in the decision to perform com-puted tomography for acute appendicitis in the ED.Am J Emerg Med 2007; 25: 489-493 [PMID: 17543650DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.08.020].

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部