论恶意占有人费用偿还请求权——兼评我国《物权法》第243条

On the Appeal Rights for Reimbursement of Ill-Intentional Procession

传统理论依无权占有人主观善恶的不同对费用偿还请求权作了区分,该设计没有认识到费用偿还请求权之基础为占有物的保管和增益事实,并不涉及无权占有人的主观心理。因而不可避免的产生漠视恶意占有人利益的情形,不利于平衡无权占有人与回复人之间的利益。在费用偿还请求权的实现上,因不区分主观善恶,应得依不当得利之规定对无权占有人加以一体保护。

According to the non-owning possessor＇s subjective mentality,the right of cost-reimbursement has been discriminated by traditional theory.The design fails to recognize that the basis of the right of cost-reimbursement is the possession of the object and the fact of gaining custody,and it has nothing to do with the non-owning possessor＇s subjective mentality.Thus,ignoring the interests of the non-owning possessor is inevitable,and it goes against the balance of the profit between the non-owning possessor and the obliged.While the right of cost-reimbursement is realized,subjective mentality is not considered,and in accordance with the provisions of unjust enrichment,all non-owning possessors should be protected.