摘要
目的了解不同清洁剂对赝复体硅橡胶色稳定性的影响,为临床选择适宜的赝复体清洁剂提供实验依据。方法制作直径12mm、高10mm的A-2000和ZY-1肤色硅橡胶试件(简称A和z)各30个,编号后按随机数字表分为6组,分别采用清洁剂异丙醇(I)、3种义齿清洁剂(P:Polident;S:Steredent:C:Cleansofl)和蒸馏水(D)浸泡(I、P、S、C、D分别为每次浸泡1、15、10、3和10min),蒸馏水冲洗1rain,吹干,重复365次;空白对照组不进行任何处理,避光保存。在浸泡前后采用CR-321色度仪测量试件的色度值,计算色差值△E。结果各种清洁剂浸泡前后赝复体硅橡胶的色差值不同,I组色差值(A:2.15,Z:2.00)显著高于其他组(P〈0.05);义齿清洁剂P(A:0.36,Z:0.36)、c(A:0.42,Z:O.37)和s(A:0.33,z:0.38)与D(A:0.22,Z:0.23)色差值的差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论异丙醇对赝复体硅橡胶色稳定性影响明显,应尽量避免使用;义齿清洁剂与蒸馏水对赝复体硅橡胶色稳定性影响不明显。
Objective To evaluate the effect of different cleaners on the color stability of two silicone rubbers used for maxillofacial prosthesis, and to provide recommendations for clinical use. Methods Thirty skin-color columniform specimens (12 mm diameter, 10 mm height) of two silicone rubber( A: A- 2000; Z: ZY-1 ) were prepared, randomly divided into 6 groups according to the table of random number, and eleaned with the following solutions: isopropyl alcohol (I), three kinds of denture cleaners (P: Polident, S: Steradent, C: Cleansoft) and distilled water (D), simulating the total immersion time of I year ( 1 , 15, 10, 3 and 10 rain each time respectively). Control group was kept in dark place without treatment. The L * , a * , b * value were tested before and after irmnersion. Then color difference value was calculated. Results Color differences were different among groups. Color difference in group I ( A : 2. 15, Z : 2. 00) were significantly greater than that in any other group. There were no significant differences between groups using denture cleaner P(A: 0.36, Z: 0.36),C(A: 0.42, Z: 0.37) and S(A: 0.33, Z: 0.38), and group D ( A: 0.22, Z : 0. 23 ). Conclusions Isopropyl alcohol causes the most severe fading, and denture cleaners and distilled water cause obscure fading.
出处
《中华口腔医学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2011年第5期300-303,共4页
Chinese Journal of Stomatology
基金
广东省科技计划(20088030301108)
关键词
义齿清洁剂
二甲基聚硅氧烷类
色
颌面假体
Denture cleaners
Dimethylpolysiloxanes
Color
Maxillofacial prosthesis