期刊文献+

中国就业政策评价:1998-2008 被引量:41

Evaluation of Employment Policies in China:1998-2008
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从消极就业政策到积极就业政策的转变,标志着中国政府以更为积极的姿态来处理就业问题。估算结果表明,1998-2008年,我国政府为落实就业政策累计支出6169.67亿元,其中用于落实消极就业政策的支出为4144.06亿元,落实积极就业政策的支出为2025.61亿元。实证分析发现,落实积极就业政策的支出和落实消极就业政策的支出与下岗失业人员的再就业之间存在长期稳定关系,落实积极就业政策的支出每变动1%会导致下岗失业人员的再就业数量同向变动0.27%,说明我国政府用于促进就业的支出的确对再就业工作显示出了积极作用;而落实消极就业政策的支出每变动1%将引起下岗失业人员的再就业数量反向变动1.05%,这一结果表明落实消极就业政策的支出吸引了更多的失业下岗人员加入失业保险体系,同时发挥出了一种"社会稳定器"的功能。 The shift from passive labor market policies(PLMPs)to active labor market policies(ALMPs)marks a more active stance of the Chinese government toward the problem of employment.Our estimation results show that the Chinese government's accumulative expenditure on employment policy implementation from 1998 to 2008 was 616.967 billion renminbi yuan,with 414.406 billion on passive labor market policy implementation,and 202.561 billion on active labor market policy implementation respectively.It is found that there exists a long-term stable relationship between the expenditure on the implementation and reemployment of laid-off workers:the 1% change of expenditure on the active results in 0.27% change of laid-off workers reemployment,implying that the expenditure aimed at promoting employment indeed had a positive effectt;while the 1% change of expenditure on the passive results in 1.05% change of laid-off workers reemployment,suggesting that the expenditure on the passive sent more laid-off workers into unemployment insurance system,which acts as a "social stabilizer".
出处 《北京师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第3期110-124,共15页 Journal of Beijing Normal University(Social Sciences)
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目"实施扩大就业的发展战略研究"(07&ZD044)
关键词 积极就业政策 消极就业政策 再就业 评价 active labor market policies(ALMPs) passive labor market policies(PLMPs) reemployment evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献45

二级参考文献21

  • 1黄祖辉,俞宁.失地农民培训意愿的影响因素分析及其对策研究[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2007,37(3):135-142. 被引量:89
  • 2Aakvik, Arild, James Heckman, Edward Vytlacil, 2005, "Estimating Treatment Effects for Discrete Outcomes When Responses to Treatment Vary: An Application to Norwegian Vocational Rehabilitation Programs", Journal of Econometrics, 125:15--51.
  • 3Bjorklund, Anders, Robert Moffitt, 1987, "The Estimation of Wage Gains and Welfare Gains in Self-selection Models", Review of Economics and Statistics 69( 1 ) : 42--49.
  • 4Carneiro, Pedro, James Heckman, and Edward Vytlacil, 2000, "Estimating the Return to Education When It Varies among Individuals", University of Chicago working paper.
  • 5Ehrenberg, Ronald G. and Smith, Robert S., 2000, Modem Labor Economics: Theory and Public Policy, Addison Wesley Longman, Inc., Massachusetts.
  • 6Friedlander, Daniel, David Greenberg, Philip Robins, 1997, " Evaluating Government Training Programs for the Economically Disadvantaged", Journal of Economlcs Literature, Vol. 45, No.4, pp. 1809--1855.
  • 7Heekman, James and Edward Vytlacil, 1999, "Local Instrumental Variables and Latent Variable Models for Identifying and Bounding Treatment Effects", National Academy of Sciences 96, 4730--4734.
  • 8Heckman, James and Edward Vytlacil, 2000, "The Relationship between Treatment Parameters within A Latent Variable Framework", Economics Letters 66( 1 ) :33--39.
  • 9Heckman, James and Edward Vytlacil, 2005, "Structural Equations, Treatment Effects, and Economic Policy Evaluation", Econometrica, Vol. 73, No. 3 (May, 2005), 669--738.
  • 10Heckman, James, LaLonde, R., Smith, J. , 1999, "The Economics and Econometrics of Training Programs", In Ashenfelter, O., Card, D. (Eds), Handbook of Labor Econometrics, Vol. III. North-Hzliand, Amsterdam.

共引文献462

同被引文献436

引证文献41

二级引证文献435

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部