摘要
遵循静态比较优势还是遵循动态比较优势参与国际分工,是宏观经济领域争论的一个热点话题。对我国东部地区11省市的实证分析表明,具有传统比较优势的资源密集型和劳动密集型产业,其比较优势对区域经济增长的带动效应已经非常微弱,甚至表现出负效应;而比较优势相对较弱的资本密集型和技术密集型产业,其比较优势对区域经济增长却表现出较强的带动效应。实证结果支持了动态比较优势有利于经济增长的观点。
It' s a hot topic in the macroeconomic area that one country should follow the static comparative advantage or dynamic comparative advantage when it participates in the international division of labor.Empirical analysis on the 11 provinces and cities in eastern China shows that for traditional resources-intensive industries and labor-intensive industries,the comparative advantages have weak driving effect or even negative effect on regional economic growth,though they are strong.But when it comes to capital-intensive industries and technology-intensive industries,despite the weak comparative advantages,they play important role on the regional economic growth.These empirical results support the view that adoption of dynamic comparative advantage would be more beneficial to regional economic growth.
出处
《国际贸易问题》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第6期12-20,共9页
Journal of International Trade
基金
2011年度上海市科技发展基金软科学研究项目(项目编号:11692104100):<"上海制造":动态比较优势路径与政策选择>的阶段性成果
关键词
动态比较优势
经济增长
RCA指数
东部地区
Dynamic comparative advantage
Economic growth
RCA index
Eastern area