期刊文献+

中国企业应对美国337条款的知识产权新战略——以江苏圣奥化学科技有限公司胜诉美国富莱克斯公司为例 被引量:5

New Strategies in Intellectual Property for Chinese Enterprises to Cope with Section 337 of US Tariff Law:Taking Jiangsu Sinorchem Technology Co.,Ltd.Won American Flexsys Company as an Example
原文传递
导出
摘要 近年来,美国利用知识产权保护措施制造贸易壁垒十分盛行,中国企业在美国国际贸易委员会(ITC)被提起337条款调查的案件急剧上升,败多胜少,损失惨重。但江苏圣奥化学科技有限公司不畏艰难,勇于迎接挑战,利用法律武器赢得了跨国官司,扩大了国际市场,为国内出口企业制定知识产权战略提供了经验。针对美国的337调查,中国企业不仅要积极应诉,而且应该未雨绸缪,提升企业自身的核心竞争力,主动在美国申请专利,或对美国竞争者的相关专利提起无效诉讼,巧妙利用美国法律体系维护自身的合法权利。 It is very common for the United States to use intellectual property rights protection measures to add barriers to trade,and the cases that Chinese enterprises involved in Section 337 of US Tariff Law which sued by ITC are dramatically increasing.However,Chinese enterprises lost much time,and suffered great losses.Jiangsu Sinorchem Technology Co.,Ltd.didn't give up to difficulty but courageously accepted the challenge,and won the transnational lawsuit case by taking advantage of legal weapons,so that it expands the international market share and provides experience for domestic export enterprises to make strategies for intellectual property.Chinese enterprises should not only actively answer lawsuits but also prepare against a rainy day.They need to improve core competitiveness of themselves and apply for a patent positively in the US.On the other hand,they can take a legal action to the relative patent of American competitors and skillfully utilize the US' legal system to safeguard their lawful rights.
作者 苏喆 秦顺华
机构地区 扬州大学法学院
出处 《国际贸易问题》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第6期159-166,共8页 Journal of International Trade
基金 国家社科基金项目"美国贸易法‘337条款’--基于国家知识产权战略的研究"的阶段性成果 项目编码:09CFX068
关键词 中国出口企业 美国关税法337条款 知识产权战略 贸易壁垒 国际法 圣奥公司 Chinese export enterprises Section 337 of US Tariff Law Intellectual property strategies Trade barrier International law Jiangsu Sinorchem Technology Co. Ltd.
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献42

共引文献9

同被引文献44

  • 1吴伟.WTO机制下的美国贸易法“301条款”评述[J].江苏科技大学学报(社会科学版),2005,5(3):84-89. 被引量:7
  • 2马元柱.全球化下经济摩擦及其应对的再探讨[J].亚太经济,2005(6):2-5. 被引量:1
  • 3曹世华.国际贸易中的知识产权壁垒及其战略应对[J].财贸经济,2006,27(6):59-61. 被引量:20
  • 4钟山主编.中国外贸发展战略研究[M].北京:中国商务出版社2010年出版.
  • 5ABLONDI I H, VENT H H. Section 337 import inves- tigations - unfair import practices [ J ]. Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review, 1981, 4 (1): 27-42.
  • 6ROGERS J W, WHITLOCK J P. Is section 337 con- sistent with the GArI~ and the TRIPs agreement? [ J ]. American University International Law Review, 2002, 17 (3) : 459 -525.
  • 7KOPPIKAR V. Evaluating the international trade com- mission's section 337 investigation [ J]. Journal of the Patent &Trademark Office Society, 2004, 86 (2): 432 - 440.
  • 8HAHN R W, SINGER H J. Assessing bias in patent infringement eases: a review of international trade com- mission decisions [ J ]. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 2008, 21 (2): 458-508.
  • 9HECKENDOM J H, VANDER SCHAAF L B. Graymarket trademark infringement actions at the U, S. in- ternational trade commission: the benefits of the forum and analysis of relevant cases [J]. The John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law, 2009, 8 (2): 271 - 289.
  • 10HNATH G M. Section 337 investigations at the US in- ternational trade commission provide a powerful remedy against misappropriation of trade secrets [ J ]. Intellec- tual Property & Technology Law Journal, 2010, 22 (6) : 1 -7.

引证文献5

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部