期刊文献+

超声诊断分级系统在非触摸性乳腺疾病中应用的评价 被引量:1

Evaluation of diagnostic classification of ultrasonography in nonpalpable breast lesions
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:评价非触摸性乳腺疾病(NPBLs)超声诊断分级的应用。方法:选取158例临床触诊阴性并接受超声体表定位患者的影像学资料,采用欧洲分级系统进行分级,并与切取活检后的病理结果进行比较。结果:158例患者病理确诊为良性124例,恶性34例。病理确诊为乳腺癌的34例患者中,超声诊断为正常/良性的3例(8.8%),交界性病变2例(5.9%),可疑/符合恶性29例(85.3%),乳腺X线诊断为正常/良性12例(35.3%),交界性9例(26.5%),可疑/符合恶性13例(38.2%)。超声的敏感性显著高于乳腺X线的敏感性(94.1%vs38.2%,P=0.000)。超声诊断的特异性和乳腺X线差异无统计学意义(96.0%vs91.1%,P=0.118)。结论:对于NPBLs的影像学诊断,超声起到较好的诊断作用。 OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of diagnostic classification and skin-marker localization of ultrasonography in no- palpable breast lesions(NPBLs). METHODS: A total of 158 patients with NPBLs were classified by european system for breast imaging and localized to surgical excision with skin-marker by ul trasonography. Clinical data were compared with pathological findings. RESULTS: There were 124 benign lesions and 34 malignant lesions in the final pathological diagnosis. In 34 malignant lesions, there was benign lesions 3 ( 8. 8 % ), broderline lesions 2 ( 5.9 % ) diagnosed by ultra sonography, which were 12 (35.3%), 9 (26.5%) and 13(38.2%) respectively, diagnosed by x-ray, malignant lesions 29 dUltrasonograph appeared to be more sensitive than mammography (94.1% vs 38.2% ,P=0. 000). There was no significant difference in specificity between them (96. 0% 91.1%, P= 0. 118). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound assessment improves breast cancer detection in women with NPBLs.
出处 《中华肿瘤防治杂志》 CAS 2011年第5期371-373,共3页 Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment
基金 辽宁省博士启动基金(20061038)
关键词 乳腺疾病 超声检查 乳腺X线检查 breast diseases ultrasonography mammography
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Berg W A, Gutierrez L, NessAiver M S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR ima- ging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer[J].Radiology, 2004, 233(3): 830- 849.
  • 2Moss H A, Britton P D, Flower C D, et al. How reliable is modern breast imaging in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions in the symptomatic population? [J].Clin Radiol, 1999,54(10): 676-682.
  • 3Board of the Faculty of Clinical Radiology. Royal college of radi ologists. Guidance on screening and symptomatic breast imaging [M]// 2nd ed. London: RCR, 2003.
  • 4Houssami N, Ciatto S, Irwig L, et al. The comparative sensitivity of mammography and ultrasound in women with breast symptoms: an age-specific analysis [J].Breast, 2002, 11 ( 2 ) 125-130.
  • 5Non-operative Diagnosis Subgroup of the National Coordinating Group for Breast Screening Pathology. Guidelines for Non-Operative Diagnostic Procedures and Reporting in Breast Cancer Screening[M]// Publication No. 50. Sheffield, UK: NHS Cancer Screening Programmes, 2001:46-51.
  • 6American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system[M]// 4th Edition ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003 :193-197.
  • 7Houssami N, Irwig L, Simpson J M, et aI. The influence of knowledge of mammography findings on the accuracy of breast ultrasound in symptomatic women[J]. Breast J, 2005, 11(3):167-172.
  • 8McCavert M, O'Donnell M E, Aroori S, et al. Ultrasound is a useful adjunct to mammography in the assessment of breast turnouts in all patients[J]. Int J Clin Pract, 2009, 63(11): 1589- 1594.
  • 9莫军扬,杨伟萍,韦长元,黄平,朱其一.高频彩色多普勒超声与X线钼靶联合应用对乳腺癌诊断价值的研究[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2008,15(10):772-774. 被引量:28
  • 10柳莉莎,冷晓玲,李平新,吕晓玉,朱丽萍.超声导向活检在可疑小乳腺癌中的诊断应用[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2007,14(22):1732-1733. 被引量:7

二级参考文献21

共引文献43

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部