期刊文献+

腹腔镜结肠癌根治术的临床评价 被引量:39

Clinical evaluation of laparoscopic radical resection of colon cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨腹腔镜结肠癌根治术治疗结肠癌的临床疗效和安全性。方法:68例Ⅱ~Ⅲ期结肠癌患者按手术方式分为腹腔镜结肠癌根治术组(腹腔镜组)和常规开腹手术切除组(开腹组)。两种手术方法均遵循肿瘤根治的原则,术后给予统一的化疗方案。对两组肿瘤根治性、手术安全性、术后胃肠功能恢复、住院时间进行比较,随访3年观察肿瘤复发和3年无瘤生存情况。结果:腹腔镜组术后并发症发生率、手术切口大小、术中出血量均低于开腹组,相比较差异有统计学意义,P〈0.05;两组均无阳性切缘,淋巴结清除数、手术时间比较差异无统计学意义,P〉0.05;腹腔镜组术后通气时间、下床时间和住院时间与开腹组比较缩短,差异有统计学意义,P〈0.05;两组患者均获随访8~36个月,两组平均随访时间、局部复发率、远处转移率和3年无瘤生存率比较,差异均无统计学意义,P〉0.05。结论:腹腔镜结肠癌根治术是一种安全、有效、可行的微创手术方式,值得临床推广应用。 OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic radical resection for patients with colon cancer. METHODS:Totally 68 cases of patients with colon cancer were divided into laparoscopic radical resection (laparoscope group) and conventional open radical resection (laparotomy group). The two surgical procedures must strictly comply with the principles of radical tumor and be given the same postoperative chemotherapy. After treatment the two groups effect of radical tumor, surgical safety, recovery time of gastrointestinal function and time of hospital stay were compared. Follow-up for 3 years, the recurrence rate of tumor and free survival rate of 3 years were observed. RESULTS: The incidence rate of postoperative complication, surgical incision and blood loss of laparoscope group were significantly lower than laparotomy group, the difference between two groups was significant (P 〈0.05). There were no positive surgical margins, the number of lymph node dissection and surgical time were no significant difference between the two groups (P〉0.05). The recovery time of gastrointestinal function and time of hospital stay of laparoscope group were significantly shorter, the difference between two groups was significant (P〈0.05). Two groups of patients were followed up for 8 to 36 months. The average follow-up time, the local recurrence rate, distant metastasis rate and free survival rate of 3 years were no significant difference between the two groups (P〉0.05). CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic radical resection for treating colon cancer is a safe, effective and feasible minimally invasive surgery, and worthy of clinical application.
作者 宋越
出处 《中华肿瘤防治杂志》 CAS 2011年第6期447-449,共3页 Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment
关键词 结肠肿瘤/外科学 腹腔镜 治疗结果 colonic neoplasms/surgery laparoscopy treatment outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1谢芳,高友福,张正华,吴学勇.老年结肠癌术后辅助化疗疗效与安全性的临床研究[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2009,16(12):945-947. 被引量:26
  • 2Mirza M S,Longman R J,Farrokhyar F,et al. Long-term outomes for laparoscopic versus open resection of nonmetastatic coloreetal cancer [J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A,2008,18(5):679-685.
  • 3郑民华,马君俊.腹腔镜外科在争议中发展[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2007,14(5):503-505. 被引量:51
  • 4吴在德 吴肇汉.外科学[M]6版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2003.267-268.
  • 5郑民华,冯波.再谈腹腔镜结直肠癌手术的根治性问题[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(19):1300-1302. 被引量:8
  • 6Aziz O,Constantinides V, Tekkis PP, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer:a meta-analysis[J]. Ann Surg Oncol,2006,13(3) :413-424.
  • 7Koopmann M C, Heise C P. Laparoscopic and minimally invar sivresection of malignant colorectal disease[J]. Surg Clin North AM,2008,88(5) : 1047-1072.
  • 8BuunenM,Veldkamp R,HopW C,et al. Survival after laparoseopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer:long term outcome of a randomized clinical trial[J].Lancet Oncol,2009, 10(1):44-52.
  • 9Fleshman J,Sargent D J,Green E,et al. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 3-year data from the COST Study Group trial[J]. Ann Surg,2007,246(4) :655-662.
  • 10JayneDG,Guillou P J,ThorpeH,et al. Randomized trial oflaparoseopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2007,25(21):3061-3068.

二级参考文献44

共引文献403

同被引文献343

引证文献39

二级引证文献522

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部