期刊文献+

调强适形放射治疗与常规放疗联合化疗治疗局部区域晚期鼻咽癌的随机对照临床研究 被引量:14

A randomized clinical study of intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs conventional radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy in treating local/regional advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:本研究旨在比较调强适形放射治疗(intensity modulated radiation therapy,IMRT)与常规放疗(radiation therapy,RT)联合化疗(chemotherapy,CT)治疗局部区域晚期鼻咽癌的临床疗效、急性反应和晚期损伤。方法:2005年1月—2007年9月,80例初治鼻咽癌患者(按92福州分期,Ⅲ期50例,ⅣA期30例)随机接受RT+CT(40例)和IMRT+CT(40例)。CT方案为顺铂为主的方案,包括放疗期间同步化疗以及放疗结束后的辅助化疗。按放射反应评分标准(RTOG/EORTC)评价急性和晚期放射损伤。采用Kaplan-Meier法评估1和2年局部区域控制率、无远处转移生存率和总生存率。结果:RT+CT组的1和2年局部区域控制率、无远处转移生存率和总生存率分别为87.5%、90.0%和87.5%以及80.0%、82.5%和80.0%;IMRT+CT组则分别为100.0%、97.5%和97.5%以及97.5%、95.0%和97.5%。2组的2年局部区域控制率和总生存率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。全组患者的急性放射损伤多为2~3级,晚期放射损伤多为1~2级。RT+CT组的口咽黏膜急性不良反应发生率较高;放疗后1年,RT+CT组中重度口干发生率为82.5%,而IMRT+CT组仅表现为轻度口干。结论:IMRT联合化疗治疗局部区域晚期鼻咽癌患者可获得较好的局部区域控制率和总生存率,且IMRT可明显减轻放疗引起的口干。 Objective:To investigate the differences in efficacy,survival outcomes,and acute and late toxicities for patients with local/regional advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma(NPC) treated by intensity-modulated radiation therapy(IMRT) combined with chemotherapy(CT) vs conventional radiation therapy(RT) combined with CT.Methods:Eighty newly diagnosed local/regional advanced NPC patients were randomized to be treated by IMRT combined with CT(IMRT+CT)(n=40) or RT combined with CT(RT+CT)(n=40) between January 2005 and September 2007.CT(cisplatin administered) protocol included concurrent CT during radiation therapy and adjuvant CT after radiation therapy.The distributions of clinical stage according to Fuzhou 92 staging system were 50 of Ⅲ stage and 30 of ⅣA stage.The acute and late radiation toxicities were evaluated by toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group(RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer(EORTC).One-and two-year local/regional control rates,distant metastasis-free survivals and overall survivals were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method.Results:The one-and two-year local/regional control rates,distant metastasis-free survivals and the overall survivals in RT+CT group were 87.5%,90.0% and 87.5%,and 80.0%,82.5% and 80.0%,respectively,which in IMRT+CT group were 100.0%,97.5% and 97.5%,and 97.5%,95.0%and 97.5%,respectively.The two-year local/regional control rate and the overall survival in IMRT+CT group were higher than those in RT+CT group(P0.05).Most patients had grade 2-3 acute radiation toxicities and grade 1-2 late radiation toxicities.The rates of oral and oropharyngeal mucosa toxicities were high in RT+CT group,and the rate of severe xerostomia was 82.5% one year after radiation therapy;however,the xerostomia severity in IMRT+CT group was mild.Conclusion:The potential advantages of IMRT+CT over RT+CT in treating local/regional advanced NPC patients might occur in local/regional control and overall survival,and the IMRT-induced xerostomia is mild.
出处 《肿瘤》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第4期343-347,共5页 Tumor
基金 广西壮族自治区卫生厅重点科研课题(编号:桂科攻07101008 22009368) 柳州市科学研究与技术开发计划项目(编号:2006031104) 广西科学研究与技术开发计划项目(编号:桂科攻09320032)
关键词 鼻咽肿瘤 调强适形放射治疗 药物疗法 联合 不良反应 生存分析 Nasopharyngeal neoplasms Radiotherapy intensity-modulated Drug therapy combination Adverse reaction Survival analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1LEE A W,SZE W M,AU J G,et al.Treatment results for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the modern era.The HortgKong experience[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2005,61(4):1107-1116.
  • 2严洁华 徐国镇 殷蔚伯 谷铣之.鼻咽癌[M].殷蔚伯,谷铣之.肿瘤放射治疗学.第3版[C].北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2002.537-573.
  • 3易俊林,高黎,黄晓东,李素艳,罗京伟,徐国镇,肖建平,蔡伟明.鼻咽癌的临床表现和预后[J].中国医学科学院学报,2006,28(3):315-317. 被引量:21
  • 4阎超,王中和,胡海生,石慧烽,金冶宁.鼻咽癌调强放射治疗计划的多序列平面剂量仪(Mapcheck)验证[J].肿瘤,2009,29(5):486-489. 被引量:16
  • 5VERBAKEL W F,CUIJPERS J P,HOFFMANS D,et al.Volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy vs.conventional IMRT in head-andneck cancer:a comparative planning and dosimetric study[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2009,74(1):252-259.
  • 6ALEKTIAR K M,BRENNAN M F,HEALEY J H,et al.Impact of intensity-modulated radiation therapy on local control in primary soft-tissue sarcoma of the extremity[J].J Clin Oncol,2008,26(20):3440-3444.
  • 7FANG F M,CHIEN C Y,TSAI W L,et al.Quality of life and survival outcome for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma receiving three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy vs.intensity-modulated radiotherapy-a longitudinal study[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2008,72(2):356-364.
  • 8KRISTENSEN C A,KJAER-KRISTOFFERSEN F,SAPRU W,et al.Nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Treatment planning with IMRT and 3D conformal radiotherapy[J] ,Acta Oncol,2007,46(2):214-220.
  • 9CHAMBERS M S,ROSENTHAL D I,WEBER R S.Radiation-induced xerostomia[J].Head Neck,2007,29(1):58-63.
  • 10LEE N,XIA P,QUIVEY J M,et al.Intensitymodulated radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma:an update of the UCSF experience[J].Int J Tadiat Oncol Biol Phys,2002,53(1):12-22.

二级参考文献14

  • 1王孝深,胡超苏,吴永如,邱杏仙,冯炎.218例鼻咽癌颈淋巴结转移规律的影像学分析[J].癌症,2004,23(9):1056-1059. 被引量:51
  • 2卢泰祥,李家尧,胡永红,张恩罴.鼻咽癌颅底骨破坏的临床研究[J].中华耳鼻咽喉科杂志,1994,29(5):295-298. 被引量:24
  • 3胡伟汉,张国义,刘立志,吴湖炳,李立,高远红,潘燚,王全师.PET-CT与MRI诊断鼻咽癌淋巴结转移的对比研究[J].癌症,2005,24(7):855-860. 被引量:33
  • 4CHAO K S,OZYIGIT G,TRAN B N,et al.Patterns of failure in patients receiving and postoperative IMRT for head-and-neck can-cer[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2003,55(2):312-321.
  • 5YAO M,DOMFELD K J,BUATTI J M,et al.Intensity-modulated radiation treatment for head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma-the University of Iowa experience[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2005,63(2):410-421.
  • 6LOW D A,DEMPSEY J F.Evaluation of the gamma dose distribution comparison method[J].Med Phys,2003,30(9):2455-2464.
  • 7van DYK J,BAMETT R B,CYGLER J E,at al.Commissioning and quality assurance of treatment planning computers[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1993,26(2):261-273.
  • 8LETOUMEAU D,GULAM M,YAN D,et al.Evaluation of a 2D diode array for IMRT quality assurance[J].Radiother Oncol,2004,70(2):199-206.
  • 9严洁华 徐国镇 见:殷蔚伯 谷铣之主编.鼻咽癌[A].见:殷蔚伯,谷铣之主编.肿瘤放射治疗学[C].北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2002.559-562.
  • 10Lee AWM,Foo W,Law SCK,et al.Nasopharyngeal carcinoma presenting symptoms and duration before diagnosis.HKMJ,1997,3(4):355-361.

共引文献53

同被引文献107

引证文献14

二级引证文献75

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部