法官释明行为规范化刍议

On Normalization of Judge's Interpretation Behavior

我国理论界对法官释明行为存在认识误区,实践中法官对释明的方式与限度把握失当,法官释明中应遵循保障诉讼有效进行、规范法官必要和适度释明、追求当事人真实意思等原则,以保证对当事人权益的有效维护。为使法官合理运用释明权,须厘清发问和告知两种释明行为方式,指导法官运用合理方式释明。对实体问题予以释明、对程序问题予以释明、对法律规定内涵之具体内容予以释明,以规范法官释明行为,达到实体正义与程序正义的有机统一。

As for judge＇s interpretation behavior,misunderstandings still exist among China＇s theoretical circles;and in practice,judges are incapable to have a good command of the ways and limits to interpret.Judges must abide by principles as protecting the legitimate interests of the injured party,making the interpretation properly and completely,seeking for the actual needs of party involved so as to effectively safeguard the rights and interests of them.It is necessary to clarify ＂questioning＂ and ＂disclosing＂ so that judges can be guided to apply reasonable ways to interpret.The interpretations about real cases,proceedings and connotations of laws are the key points to normalize judges＇ behavior and realize the integration of entity justice and proceeding justice.