期刊文献+

酒酒球菌在不同模拟酒培养基中的降酸效果研究 被引量:1

Study on deacidification of Oenococcus oeni in different simulated wine cultures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 【目的】选择一种成分简单、降酸效果好的模拟酒培养基,为后续的苹果酸-乳酸发酵研究奠定基础。【方法】利用高效液相色谱等方法,分别测定不同时段酒酒球菌31 MBR和SD-2a在A、B、C、D4种模拟酒培养基中的L-苹果酸、L-乳酸质量浓度及pH值和OD值,研究不同培养基中L-苹果酸的降解效果。【结果】酒酒球菌31 MBR在A、B、D 3种培养基中的降酸效果基本一致,在第4天时L-苹果酸的降解率分别为90.75%,89.47%和91.92%,在C培养基中降解率稍低,为79.99%;SD-2a在B、D 2种模拟酒培养基中的降酸效果基本一致,第4天时L-苹果酸降解率分别为94.32%和91.49%,而在A、C 2种模拟酒培养基中降酸较慢,第4天时的L-苹果酸降解率分别为51.24%和69.21%。液相色谱分析表明,酒酒球菌31 MBR和SD-2a在A、B培养基中培养,均能够获得分离效果较好的色谱图。【结论】A培养基适于酒酒球菌31 MBR的苹果酸-乳酸发酵,B培养基适于酒酒球菌SD-2a的苹果酸-乳酸发酵。 【Objective】 The present study was aimed to obtain a simple simulated wine culture of large malic acid consumption for scientific research.【Method】 HPLC and other methods were used to determine L-malic acid and L-lactic acid,pH and OD,in order to know the efficiency of L-malic acid degradation.【Result】 The results showed that the rates of malic acid degradation were 90.75%,89.47%,79.99% and 91.92% respectively in the simulated wine cultures A,B,C and D innoculated with Oenococcus oeni 31MBR after four days.O.oeni SD-2a was able to degrade 94.32% and 91.49% of the malic acid in the simulated wine cultures B and D after four days,respectively,but 51.24% and 69.21% in the simulated wine cultures A and C,respectively.HPLC analysis showed that O.oeni 31MBR and SD-2a respectively in the simulated wine cultures A and B could obtain good chromatogram.【Conclusion】 Simulated culture A was more suitable for O.oeni 31MBR to degrade L-malic acid while simulated culture B was more suitable O.oeni SD-2a to decompose L-malic acid.
出处 《西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版)》 CSCD 北大核心 2011年第5期172-178,共7页 Journal of Northwest A&F University(Natural Science Edition)
基金 国家葡萄产业技术体系专项(nyctx-30-ch-03)
关键词 苹果酸-乳酸发酵 酒酒球菌 模拟酒培养基 降酸效果 malolactic fermentation Oenococcus oeni simulation wine culture deacidification
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1潘海燕,徐岩,赵光鳌.苹果酸乳酸发酵的研究进展[J].食品与发酵工业,2003,29(11):75-80. 被引量:18
  • 2Jussier D,Dube M A,Mira de Orduna R. Effect of simultaneous inoculation of yeast and bacteria on fermentation kinetics and key wine parameters during white winemaking [J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2006,72(1) : 221 227.
  • 3Del P V,Rodriguez H, Carrascosa A V, et al. In vitro removal of ochratoxin A by wine lactic acid bacteria [J].Journal of Food Protection,2007,70(9) :2155-2160.
  • 4Shulman E. Correcting acidity[J].Practical Winery & Vine yard,1990(1) :32-33.
  • 5Boulton R B, Singleton V L, Bisson L F, et al. Principles and practices of wine making [M]. New York: Chapman & Hail, 1996.
  • 6JayJM.现代食品微生物学[M].5版.徐岩,译.北京:中国轻工业出版社,2001.
  • 7Nicolas T,Ronan N,Romain C. A new chemically defined medium for wine lactic acid bacteria [J]. Food Research International,2009,42 (3) :363-367.
  • 8Sanna K V, Simo V L. The use of malolactic Oenococcus oeni (ATCC 39401) for deacidification of media containing glucose, malic acid and citric acid [J]. Eur Food Res Technol,2000,211 (6):438-442.
  • 9Ignacio V, Angela M, Rosario M. Tannase activity by lactic acid bacteria isolated from grape must and wine [J]. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2004,96(2) : 199- 204.
  • 10赵国群,张桂,张秋生,张薇.发酵过程果酒成分对苹果酸乳酸发酵的影响[J].酿酒科技,2006(5):39-42. 被引量:4

二级参考文献44

共引文献30

同被引文献18

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部