期刊文献+

反垄断法视野下职业体育联盟的性质考察——基于《谢尔曼法》的司法实践 被引量:10

An Antitrust Analysis of Professional Sports League——Based on Sherman Act Judicial Experience
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国是一个职业体育非常发达的国家,同时,它又是一个反垄断法较为完备,司法经验较为丰富的国家。美国职业体育的发展一直以来都受到反垄断法的调整,尤其是《谢尔曼法》一直伴随着职业体育的反垄断进程。在美国反垄断法对职业体育进行调整的过程中,对作为职业体育市场基础性结构的职业体育联盟性质的认定是至关重要的,这直接影响到许多反垄断案件的判决结论。采用文献资料调研、对比分析、逻辑分析、例证等方法,就Cop-perweld案前后美国各法院在相关案例中对职业体育联盟是单一实体还是企业联营的性质认定做初步探讨;对职业体育联盟单一实体和企业联营两种理论的证据进行了分析,并根据Copperweld原则对职业联盟的性质进行认定;从反垄断法与经济效率的角度考察我国建立职业体育联盟的理性选择,并就存在的反垄断法风险和规避途径进行分析。 United States is one of the most developed countries in professional sports industry,and its antitrust laws judicial experience is rich.American professional sports is always be adjusted by the antitrust laws,particularly the Sherman Act has been accompanied by the antitrust process in professional sports.The nature of professional sports leagues is a critical issue in the process of professional sports antitrust.This issue has immediate impact on numerous sports cases.This paper,using the method of literature review,comparative analysis and logic analysis,discusses that the U.S.courts relevant legal views on professional sports leagues is a single entity or joint venture,and provides a brief evidence on two theories,Hereafter,the nature of professional leagues were identified in accordance with the Copperweld.Finally,this paper discusses the Chinese rational choice of establishing professional sports leagues,and explores antitrust risks and avoiding approach.
作者 姜熙 谭小勇
机构地区 上海政法学院
出处 《体育科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第6期20-26,58,共8页 China Sport Science
基金 上海高校优秀青年科研基金项目(szf09005) 上海市教委科研创新项目资助(10YS223)
关键词 职业体育联盟 谢尔曼法 反垄断 单一实体 企业联营 professional sports league Sherman Act antitrust single entity joint venture
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献75

  • 1全国人民代表大会常务委员会.中华人民共和国反垄断法[Z].北京:全国人民代表大会常务委员会,2007,8.
  • 2Joseph J McMahon.A History and Analysis of Baseball's Three Antitrust Exemptions[J].Villanova Sports&Entertainment Law Forum,1995,3:259-261.
  • 3Comment.Monophony in Manpower:Organized Baseball Meets the Antitrust Laws[Z].YALE L.J,1953,62:576-586.
  • 4Richard B.Blackwell,Baseball's Antitrust Exemption and the Reserve System:Reappraisal of an Anachronism[J].WM.&MARY L.REV,1971,12:859-861.
  • 5Comment.Organized Baseball and the Law[Z].YALE L.J,1937,46:1386-1387.
  • 6E Thomas Sullivan,Herbert Hovenkamp.Antitrust Low,Policy and Procedure[M].1994,33.
  • 7National League of Professional Baseball Clubs v.Federal Baseball Club,Inc[Z].D.C.Cir,1920,681,682,683.
  • 8Federal Baseball Club,Inc.v.National League of Professional Baseball Clubs[Z].U.S,1922,200,208.
  • 9Toolson v.New York Yankees,Inc[Z].Toolson v,1952,198.
  • 10Haywood v.NBA[Z].Haywood v,1971,1204.

共引文献52

同被引文献186

引证文献10

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部