期刊文献+

基于AOP的运行时验证中的冲突检测 被引量:8

Conflicts Detection in Runtime Verification Based on AOP
下载PDF
导出
摘要 现有的形式化验证方法除了在模型层面对系统进行验证以外,越来越倾向于直接针对系统的实际代码和具体运行.运行时验证技术验证的对象是具体程序,它试图把形式化验证技术部署到程序的实际运行过程中.然而在把形式化技术部署到实际运行过程中会出现一系列在模型层面验证通常不会出现的问题,对这些问题中的冲突现象进行了研究,定义了运行时验证技术中存在的两种冲突,并给出了相应的检测算法.最后,对这些算法进行了实现和实例研究,结果表明了该方法的有用性. Nowadays,instead of only verifying systems at the model level,current state-of-the-art verification techniques tend to focus on real code and real system’s execution.Runtime verification checks the system’s execution and tries to bridge the gap between formal verification techniques and real systems.However,this brings about some problems which usually do not appear in model-level verification.This paper analyses the problem in runtime verification.It defines two kinds of conflicts and lists their corresponding detection algorithms.These algorithms are implemented based on an open source runtime verification tool and some real cases are examined.The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
出处 《软件学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2011年第6期1224-1235,共12页 Journal of Software
基金 国家自然科学基金(60970035 91018013 90818024 60803042)
关键词 运行时验证 面向方面编程 切入点 冲突检测 runtime verification; aspect-oriented programming; pointcut; conflict detection;
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Bauer A, Leucker M, Schallhart C. Runtime verification for LTL and TLTL. ACM Trans. on Software and Methodology (TOSEM), upcoming. 2010.
  • 2Dwyer MB, Avrunin GS, Corbett JC. Property specification pattems for finite-state verification. In: Proc. of the 2nd Workshop on Formal Methods in Software Practice (FMSP'98). New York: ACM Press, 1998.7-15. [doi: 10.1145/298595.298598].
  • 3Kiczales G, Lamping J, Mendhekar A, Maeda C, Lopes C, Loingtier JM, Irwin J. Aspect-Oriented programming. In: Proc. of the European Conf. on Object-Oriented Programming. LNCS 1241, Springer-Verlag, 1997. 220-242.
  • 4Kiczales G, Hilsdale E, Hugunin J, Kersten M, Palm J, Griswold WG. An overview of AspectJ. In: Proc. of the ECOOP 2001. London: Springer-Verlag, 2001. 327-353.
  • 5Kim MZ, Viswanathan M, Kannan S, Lee I, Sokolsky O. Java-MaC: A run-time assurance approach for Java programs. Formal Methods in System Design, 2004,24(2): 129-155. [doi: 10.1023/B:FORM.0000017719.43755.7c].
  • 6Allan C, Avgustinov P, Christensen AS, Hendren L, Kuzins S, Lhot~.k O, de Moor O, Sereni D, Sittampalam G, Tibble J. Adding trace matching with free variables to AspectJ. In: Proc. of the OOPSLA 2005. New York: ACM Press, 2005. 345-364.
  • 7Chen F, Jin DY, Meredith P, Rosu G. Monitoring oriented programming--A project overview. In: Proc of the ICICIS 2009. New York: ACM Press, 2009.72-77.
  • 8Colombo C, Pace G J, Schneider G. LARVA--Safer monitoring of real-time Java programs. In: Proc. of the 7th IEEE Int'l Conf. on Software Engineering and Formal Methods (SEFM). Hanoi: IEEE Computer Society, 2009.33-37. [doi: 10.1109/SEFM.2009.13].
  • 9Jones M, Hamlen KW. Disambiguating aspect-oriented security policies. In: Proc of the AOSD 2010. New York: ACM Press, 2010. 193-204. [doi: 10.1145/1739230.1739253].
  • 10Li XD, Qiu XK, Wang LZ, Lei B, Wang WE. UML state machine diagram driven runtime verification of Java programs for message interaction consistency. In: Proc. of the 2008 ACM Symp. on Applied Computing (SAC 2008). New York: ACM Press, 2008. 384-389. [doi: 10.1145/1363686.1363781].

同被引文献89

引证文献8

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部