期刊文献+

调强适形放射治疗剂量验证中CT密度值的校准分析 被引量:4

Calibration of CT density values in dosimetry verification of intensity modulated radiation therapy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的基于调强适形放射治疗(IMRT)验证体模,分析放射治疗计划系统中CT密度转换曲线在IMRT剂量验证中的影响,并加以校准。方法利用CT电子密度体模刻度计划系统中的CT密度转换曲线,取12例鼻咽癌患者的IMRT计划,分别移植至IMRT验证体模,计算剂量分布,并于剂量均匀处放置测量点,利用电离室测量出其实际剂量。将IMRT验证体模的物理密度与对应的CT值输入计划系统,对CT密度转换曲线进行修正,重新计算剂量,在保持其他计划参数一致的前提下,比较前后两次计算值与实测值的差异。结果12例鼻咽癌IMRT计划中,前后两次计算值和实测值的平均误差分别为1.96%±0.87%和0.63%±0.74%,修正后的计算值误差控制在±2%以内,而修正前计算值的最大误差为3.24%。结论利用修正后的CT密度转换曲线,计划中的剂量计算值更加贴近实际测量值。为提高IMRT剂量验证的精确性,验证体模在使用之前必须进行CT密度值的校准、确认。 Objective Based on intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) phantom, the impact of CT-to-density conversion curve on dosimetry verification of IMRT is investigated and calibrated. Methods The electron density phantom was used to establish the CT-to-density conversion curve in radiation treatment planning system. IMRT plans of 12 nasopharynx carcinoma patients were chosen, copied to IMRT phantom and computed for the dose distribution. For each plan a measured point was put at the place where the dose was well-distributed and its dose value was measured using the ionization chamber. The physical density of IMRT phantom and its CTvalue were input into the planning system, to make a calibration for the CT-to-density conversion curve. The dose distribution was recomputed for each IMRT plan. Other parameters were kept the same in the plans and the differences between the computed dose values before and after correction were compared with the measured values. Results In 12 nasopharynx carcinoma IMRT plans, the average error of computed dose values was 1.96% ± 0.87% before correction and 0.63%± 0.74% after correction, compared with measured values. The error between measured values and computed values after correction was less than ±2% whereas the maximum error of computed values before correction was 3.24%. Conclusions The computed dose values are closer to the measured values when using the calibrated CT-to-density conversion curve. The CT density values of IMRT phantom should be verified before usage, so as to increase the accuracy of IMRT dosimetry verification.
出处 《国际放射医学核医学杂志》 2011年第1期54-58,共5页 International Journal of Radiation Medicine and Nuclear Medicine
关键词 放射疗法 调强适形 放射治疗计划 剂量学验证 CT密度值 Radiotherapy, intensity modulated Radiotherapy planning dosimetry verification CT density value
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Cozzi L,Foqliata A,Buffa F,et al.Dosimetric impact of computed tomography calibration on a commercial treatment planning system for external radiation therapy.Radiother Oncol,1998,48f31:335-338.
  • 2祁振宇,黄劭敏,邓小武.放疗计划CT值的校准检测及其影响因素分析[J].癌症,2006,25(1):110-114. 被引量:53
  • 3Tailor RC,Hanson WF,Ibbott GS.Tc-51:experience from 150 institutions,common errors,and helpful hints.J Appl Clin Med Phys,2003,4(2):102-111.
  • 4杨克柽.螺旋CT图像性能参数检测方法研究.广州:第一军医大学,2002.
  • 5Mutic S,Palta JR,Butker EK,et al.Quality assurance for computed-tomography simulators and the computed-tomography simulation process:report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No.66.Med Phys,2003,30(10):2762-2792.
  • 6Beneventi S,Chionne F,Gobbi G,et al.Quantitative CT tomography for radiotherapy treatment planning:Calibration phantom and sources of error.Radiother Oncol,1995,37(suppl 1):S41.
  • 7Constantinou C,Harrington JC,Cadieux RA,et al.Dosimetry at lung-muscle and lung-bone interface using 6 MV and 10 MV X rays and 12-18 MeV electrons.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1988,15(suppl 1):244.
  • 8Constantinou C,Harrington JC,Dewerd LA.An electron density calibration phantom for CT-based treatment planning computers.Med Phys,1992,19(2):325-327.
  • 9Mackie TR,El-Khatib E,Battista J,et al.Lung dose corrections for 6-and 15-MV x rays.Med Phys,1985,12(3):327-332.
  • 10Waghorn B,Shah AP,Ngwa W,et al.A computational method for estimating the dosimetric effect of intra-fraction motion on step-andshoot IMRT and compensator plans.Phys Med Biol,2010,55(14):4187-4202.

二级参考文献22

  • 1马金利,蒋国樑.调强适形放射治疗剂量学验证体系的建立[J].中国肿瘤,2004,13(8):485-489. 被引量:8
  • 2周振山,于广辉,乔艳萍.调强放射治疗计划的剂量验证[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2005,25(1):69-70. 被引量:5
  • 3于金明,李宝生.调强放射治疗的临床应用现状与存在的问题[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2005,27(3):188-190. 被引量:43
  • 4肖锋,孙朝阳,石梅,张学成,陆宙,陆军,刘晓莉.鼻咽癌动态调强放疗计划的剂量学验证[J].现代肿瘤医学,2007,15(2):178-180. 被引量:17
  • 5MUTIC S, PALTA J R, BUTKER E K, et al. Quality assurance for computed tomography simulators and the computed tomography simulation process: report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 66 [J]. Med Phys, 2003,30 (10) :2762-2793.
  • 6BENEVENTI S, CHIONNE F,GOBBI G, et al. Quantitative CT tomography for radiotherapy treatment planning: calibration phantom andsources of error [J]. Radiother Oncol, 1995, 37 (supplement): 41.
  • 7LUCA C, ANTONELLA F,FRANCESCA B, et al. Dosimetric impact of computed tomography calibration on a commercial treatment planning system for external radiation therapy [J]. Radiother oncol, 1998,48(3) :335-338.
  • 8METCALFE P. Radiotherapy treatment planning [M]// METCALFE P,KRON T, eds. The physics of radiotherapy X-rays. Oxford : Oxford university press, 2000:293-364.
  • 9MACKIE T R, EL-KHATIB E,BATTISTA J, et al. Lung dose correction for 6 and 15 MV X-rays[J]. Med Phys, 1985,12(3) :327.
  • 10CONSTANTINOU C, HARRINGTON J C, CADIEUX R A, et al. Dosimetry at lung-muscle and lung-bone interfaees using 6 MV and 10 MV X-rays and 12-18 MeV electrons [J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1993,15(supplement 1 ) : 244.

共引文献72

同被引文献32

  • 1祁振宇,黄劭敏,邓小武.放疗计划CT值的校准检测及其影响因素分析[J].癌症,2006,25(1):110-114. 被引量:53
  • 2胡选民.肿瘤放射物理学[M].北京:原子能出版社,1999.
  • 3宋钢,林辉,赵攀,吴爱东,李贵,景佳,曹瑞芬,程梦云,黄晨昱,吴宜灿.剂量计算中解析组织非均匀性修正方法的比较研究[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2007,27(5):470-472. 被引量:3
  • 4马林,王连元.周桂霞.肿瘤断层放射治疗[M].成都:四川科学技术出版社,2010:55.
  • 5BENEVENTI S, CHIONNE F, GOBBI G, et al. Quantitative CT tomography for radiotherapy treatment planning: calibration phantom and sources of error [J]. Radiother Oncol, 1995, 37 (1): 41.
  • 6THOMAS S. Relative electron density calibration of CT scanners for radiotherapy treatment planning [J]. Br J Radiol, 1999, 72 (860): 781-786.
  • 7MUTIC S, PALTA J R, BUTKER E K, et al. Quality assurance for computed tomography simulators and the computed tomography simulation process: report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 66 [J]. Med Phys, 2003, 30(10): 2762- 2793.
  • 8SCHNEIDER U, PEDRONI E, LOMAX A. The calibration of CT Hounsfield uniform radiotherapy treatment planning [J]. Phys Med Biol, 1996, 41(1): 111-124.
  • 9VAN DYK J, BARNETT R B, CYGLER J E, et al. Commissioning and quality assurance of treatment planning computers [J]. Int J Radiat OncoI Biol Phys, 1993, 26(2): 261-273.
  • 10SCHNEIDER W, BORTFELD T, SCHLEGEL W. Correlation between CT numbers and tissue parameters needed for Monte Carlo simulations of clinical dose distributions[J]. Phys Med Biol, 2000, 45(2): 459-478.

引证文献4

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部