摘要
目的:观察氨曲南治疗中重度下呼吸道感染的临床疗效和药物经济学分析。方法:159例中重度下呼吸道感染患者随机分为氨曲南治疗组(A组)53例,头孢匹罗对照组(B组)53例和头孢哌酮钠舒巴坦钠对照组(C组)53例,比较三组临床疗效及不良反应情况,并进行药物经济学分析。结果:ABC三组临床有效率分别为90.6%、88.7%、64.2%,A、B两组与C组比较有显著差异性(P<0.05),药物经济学分析氨曲南价格远低于头孢匹罗。结论:临床治疗中重度下呼吸道感染时,氨曲南是一个较为有效、安全、经济、合理的选择。
Objective: To observe the clinical effect and economic analysis ofaztreonam when treating severe lower respiratory tra -ct infection- Methods: Randomly divided 159 patients into aztreonam treatment group (group A), cefpirome group (group B) and cefoperaz -one sodium and sulbactam sodium group (group C), 53 cases in each- Comparing the clinical effect and adverse reactions meanwhile doing medicine economic analysis- Results: The clinical effective rates of the 3 groups were 90-6%, 88-7% and 64-2%- Compared with group C, there were significantly differences in group A and B- The price of aztreonam was far more less than that of cefpirome by the medicine economic analysis- Conclusion: When treating severe lower respiratory tract infection in clinical, aztreonam is an effective, safe, economic and reasonable choice-
出处
《中医临床研究》
2011年第9期25-26,共2页
Clinical Journal Of Chinese Medicine
关键词
氨曲南
头孢匹罗
头孢哌酮钠舒巴坦钠
下呼吸道感染
Aztreonam
Cefpirome
Cefoperazone sodium and sulbactam sodium
Lower respiratory tract infection