期刊文献+

我国上市公司控股股东利益侵占行为研究:一个委托代理模型 被引量:3

Study of Violation Behavior of Controlling Shareholder of China's Listed Company:A Principle-Agent Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国上市公司控股股东侵占上市公司以及中小股东利益的行为屡见不鲜。其主要途径包括:虚假招股说明书、关联交易、股利政策、定向增发以及利润操纵。上市公司中小股东与控股股东间存在着委托代理关系。控股股东的利益侵占行为不仅降低了上市公司的期望收益,还降低了控股股东自身的努力程度以及所享有的收益份额。通过推进上市公司股权分散化、完善上市公司信息披露制度、推进"以股抵债"等金融创新,可以纠正上市公司控股股东侵占中小股东利益行为。 The violation of controlling shareholder of listed company to the interests of minority shareholders is common phenomenon.Main ways of the violation include false prospectus,related party transactions,dividend policy,private placement and profit manipulation.The principle-agent relationship exists between minority shareholders of listed company and the controlling shareholder.The violation behavior not only reduces the expected revenue of the listed company,but also reduces the shareholder's own effort and revenue share.By promoting decentralization of share of listed company,improving the information disclosure system and promoting the "debt-equity swaps" financial innovation,the violation behavior of controlling shareholder of listed company will be corrected.
作者 朱建平
机构地区 南京大学商学院
出处 《区域金融研究》 2011年第5期73-77,共5页 Journal of Regional Financial Research
关键词 控股股东 利益侵占 私有收益 委托代理 Controlling Shareholder Violation Private Earnings Principle-Agent Debt-Equity Swaps
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1唐宗明,蒋位.中国上市公司大股东侵害度实证分析[J].经济研究,2002,37(4):44-50. 被引量:599
  • 2吕长江,周县华.公司治理结构与股利分配动机——基于代理成本和利益侵占的分析[J].南开管理评论,2005,8(3):9-17. 被引量:141
  • 3刘星,豆中强.基于跨期投资视角的大股东利益侵占行为研究[J].系统工程学报,2010,25(2):216-221. 被引量:7
  • 4平新乔.微观经济学十八讲[M].北京大学出版社,2005.
  • 5Barclay Michael,Cliford Holderness.Private Benefits of Control of Public corporations [J].Journal of Financial Economics,1989(25).
  • 6Demsetz Harold, Kenneth Lehn.The structure of Corporate Ownership:Cause 'and consequences [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1985 (93).
  • 7Aghion Philippe,Patrick Bohon.An incomplete Contract approach to Financial Contracting [J].Review of Economic Studies, 1992(59).
  • 8Rafael La Porta,Florencio Lopez -de -Silanes,Andrei Shleifer and Robert W. Vishny.Investor Protection and Corporate valuation[R]. Harvard and University of Chicago, 1999b.
  • 9Johnson S,La Porta R,Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A. Tunneling[J] .Ameirican Economic Review,2000(90).
  • 10Cofee John. Do Norms Matter? A Cross-country Examination of Private Benefits of Control [R].Working Paper, Columbia University Law School,2001.

二级参考文献60

  • 1郝颖,刘星,伍良华.基于内部人寻租的扭曲性过度投资行为研究[J].系统工程学报,2007,22(2):128-133. 被引量:18
  • 2Berle E, Means G. The Modem Corporation and Privation Property[ M]. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1932.
  • 3Fama E, Jensen M. Separation of ownership and control[J]. Journal of Law and Economics, 1983, 26(2) : 301 -325.
  • 4Demsetz H, Lehn K. The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences[ J]. The Journal of Political Economy, 1985, 93(6) : 1155 -1177.
  • 5Johnson S, Boone P, Breach A, et al. Corporate governance in the Asian financial crisis[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2000, 58(2) : 141 -186.
  • 6La porta R, Silanes L, Shleifer A. Investor protection and corporate valuation [ J ]. Journal of Finance, 2002, 57 ( 3 ) : 1147 - 1169.
  • 7Smith C, Stalz R. The determinants of firms' hedging policies[ J]. Journal of Finance and Quantitative Analysis, 1985, 20 (4) : 391 -405.
  • 8Boyle G, Guthrie G. Investment, uncertainty and liquidity[ J ]. Journal of Finance, 2003, 58 (5) : 2143 - 2166.
  • 9Froot K, Stein J. Risk management, capital budgeting and capital structure policy for financial institutions [ J ]. Journal of Finance Economics, 1998, 47( 1 ): 55- 82.
  • 10Hennessy C, Levy A, Whited T. Testing Q theory with financing frictions [ J ]. Journal of Finance Economics, 2007, 83 (3) : 691 -717.

同被引文献7

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部