1COMET Study Group UK. Effect of low-dose mobile versus traditional ep idural techniques onmode of delivery: a randomised contr olled trial[J].Lancet, 2001,358(9275) : 19-23.
2Le RC, Carayol M,Jacluemin S, et al. Isepidural analgesia arisk factor foroeci put posterior or transverse positions during labour[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2005,123(1) :22-26.
1Rechardson MG. Regional aneshesia for obstetrics. Anesthesiol Clin North America, 2000,18(2):383.
2Tsen LC,Thue B,Datta S,et al.Is combined spinal- analgesia associated with more rapid cervical dilation in nulliparous patients when compared with conventional epidural analgesia? Anesthesiology, 1999,91(4) :920.
3Norris MC, Fogel ST, Conway - Long C. Combined spinal - epidural versus epidural labor analgesia. Anesthesiology, 2001,95 (4) : 913.
4Zhang J, Klebanoff MA, Simonian R. Epidural analgesia in association with duration of labor and mode of delivery:a quantitative review.Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1999,180(5) :970.
5Alexander JM, Lucas MJ, Ramin SM, et al. The course of labor with and without epidural analgesia.Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1998,178(3) :516.
6Hata T, Manabe A, Makihara K, et al. Plasma catecholamines and doppler - derived cardiac time intervals in vaginally and cesarean delivered neonates.Gynecol Obstet Invest, 1997,44(3):173.
7Polley LS,Columb MO,Naughton NN,et al. Relative analgesic potencies of ropivacaine and bupivacaine for epidural analgesia in labor:implications for therapeutic indexes. Anesthesiology, 1999,90 : 944-950.
8田开鏸.产科内分泌[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1981.187-209.
9Amiel-Tison C,Barrier G,Shnider SM,et al. A new neurologic and adaptive capacity scoring system for evaluating obstetric medications in full-term newborns. Anesthesiology, 1982,56 : 340-350.
10Gaiser RR, Venkateswaren P,Cheek TG,et al. Comparison of 0.25% ropivacaine and bupivacaine for epidural analgesia for labor and vaginal delivery. J Clin Anesth, 1997,9 : 564-568.
