摘要
《新修玉篇》和《篇海》都是在《类玉篇海》基础上编写成书的,前者在字书史上影响甚微,而后者在字书史上则具有非常重要的地位。《篇海》诸多失误被后世字书所吸收,给字典的编纂和使用带来许多不便。由于两书同出一源,因此利用《新修玉篇》不仅可以纠正后世字书的某些失误,还可以对《汉语大字典》《中华字海》所收的某些疑难俗字作出辨识。
Xinxiuyupian and Pianhai are both written based on Leiyupianhai, and Pianhai is far more important in the history of Chinese characters than Xinxiuyupian. Subsequent dictionaries contain man- y mistakes, which could ascend to Pianhai, making the codification and use of dictionaries confusing. Since Xinxiuyupian and Pianhai are of the same source, the study of the knotty Chinese characters based on Xinxiuyupian can not only help to correct the mistakes in subsequent dictionaries, but also help to identify some knotty Chinese characters in Hanyudazidian and Zhonghuazihai.
出处
《河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第3期71-73,共3页
Journal of Hebei University(Philosophy and Social Science)
关键词
新修玉篇
篇海
疑难字
考释
Xinxiuyupian
Pianhai
knotty Chinese characters
interpretation