期刊文献+

有限责任公司股权质押效力规则的反思与重构 被引量:31

Rethinking and Restructuring the Rules on the Effect of Share Pledges in Limited Liability Companies
原文传递
导出
摘要 《担保法》第78条与《担保法司法解释》第103条应予废止,股权质押合同原则上自其成立时起生效。《物权法》第226条第1款应修改为股权质权自公司股东名册记载股权出质事实起生效,工商行政部门出质登记仅具有对抗等三人的效力。股权质押合同的生效和股权质权的设定均无需遵守《公司法》第72条有关股东向公司外第三人转让股权的程序性规定。目标公司对质权人负有尊重和维护质押股权价值的义务。现行部门规章对外资公司股权质押行为采取审批生效主义的保守态度应予废除,从而将股权质押效力彻底回归合同法、物权法与公司法的轨道,最终实现内外资公司股权质押规则的统一。 Article 78 of the Guarantee Law and Article 103 of the Judicial Interpretation of Guarantee Law should be repealed,and the pledge contract shall in principle go into effect as the date of establishment.Article 226 Paragraph 1 of the Real Right Law should be amended as follows:the right of share pledges shall be established after the registry of company shareholders has recorded the pledge and the pledge registered by the administrative department for industry and commerce only has the effect of standing up to any third party.The effectiveness of the pledge contract and establishment of the right of share pledges do not need to comply with the relevant procedural provisions concerning a shareholder transferring his/her stock rights to any one other than the shareholders stipulated in Article 72 of the Company Law.Target company shall have the obligation to the pledgee to respect and maintain the value of pledged shares.The conservative attitude of taking the measure of effectiveness upon approval towards the share pledge of foreign-invested companies in the existing regulations should be repealed with a view to making the effectiveness of the share pledge back to the track of contract law,property law and company law,finally realizing the unification of rules on the share pledge in domestic and foreign-invested companies.
作者 徐海燕
出处 《中国法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第3期163-175,共13页 China Legal Science
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1国家工商总局局长周伯华2009年12月24日在全国工商行政管理工作会议上的讲话,《深入落实科学发展观,切实坚持“四个只有”,为促进经济社会又好又快发展不断做出新贡献》,http://www.saic.gov.cn/ywdt/ldhd/jhyls/xxb/200912/t2009122578970.html,2009年12月26日访问.
  • 2中国证券登记结算公司.《证券质押登记业务实施细则》第2条.
  • 3吴春岐.从解释论的视角论我国股权质押制度的新发展[J].山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2009,54(2):125-130. 被引量:3
  • 4《公司法》第33条第2款和第3款.
  • 5朱庆.股权变动模式的再梳理[J].法学杂志,2009,30(12):127-129. 被引量:18
  • 6日本《公司法》第147条第1款.
  • 7象山天子禽业专业合作社与赵余建质押合同纠纷上诉案(2010)浙甬商终字第538号,法宝引证码CLI.C.339238.
  • 8浙江省缙云县人民法院在贾旺水诉郑树堂质押合同纠纷案(2009)丽缙商初字第1084号判决书.法宝引证码CLI.C.257527.
  • 9汪洞博客.《股权被质押的公司净资产大幅度贬值后,质权人的合法权益如何保护?》,http://lawyerwj.blog.sohu.cow./3842555.html.2010年8月1日访问.
  • 10黄建文,李银芬.论《物权法》中有限责任公司的股权质押制度[J].学术界,2008(1):165-170. 被引量:7

二级参考文献26

共引文献83

引证文献31

二级引证文献246

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部