期刊文献+

北京中心城区不同社会阶层混合居住利弊评价——对北太平庄和北新桥两个街道辖区的调查 被引量:3

Assessment of Social-Mixed Housing in Beijing Central City:Survey of Beitaipingzhuang and Beixinqiao Subdistricts
下载PDF
导出
摘要 北京中心城区各个街道内不同阶层居民混合居住程度不同。本文选择了两个存在差异的街道辖区,通过问卷及访谈,调查了居民之间的工具性联系和情感性联系,并依照这些调查资料,评估了在街道一级空间范围内不同社会阶层混合居住的利弊。研究结果显示,社会中下阶层更受益于混合居住,但相对匀质的街道在社会互动方面更具有优势。本文提出两项建议:第一,在街道范围内宜大混居,小聚居。第二,应加强混合居住街道不同阶层居民的社会互动。 Through questionnaires and interviews,this paper assesses the advantages and disadvantages of two subdistricts of different social-mixed degree in Beijing central city from instrumental and emotional links between the residents' social behavior.It concludes that,in these two subdistrcts,lower-middle class benefits more from social-mixed housing and social-mixed subdistrict doesn't have more advantages than the relative homogeneous subdistrict in term of social interaction.The advantages and disadvantages of social-mixed neighborhood of other scale need to be discussed.Finally,the paper gives two suggestions.First,in the scale of subdistrict,residents should be social-mixed in macro-level and concentrated in micro-level.Second,the interaction of residents of different social class in the subdistrict should be strengthened.
出处 《北京社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第3期73-78,共6页 Social Sciences of Beijing
基金 国家自然科学基金(40871074)
关键词 街道辖区 混合居住 利弊评价 北京城区 Social-mixed housing Assessment Subdistrict Beijing central city
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1耿诺.北京市将新建收购100万套保障房[N].北京日报,2010-12-15.
  • 2胡雪琴.京沪兰三地调查-你赞成贫富混居吗?.中国经济周刊,2010,.
  • 3贺有利.大规模廉租房和公租房建设弊多利少[N].法制日报,2010-08-18.
  • 4Abt Associates Inc. An historical and baseline assessment of hope vi: volume i, cross-site report [ R]. Washington, DC: Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Policy Development and Research, 1996.
  • 5Atkinson, R. Housing policies, social mix and community outcomes [ R ]. Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute, 2008.
  • 6Brophy, P., Smith, R. N. Mixed-income housing: factors for success [ J]. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 1997 (2).
  • 7Rosenbauma, J. E, Linda K. Strohb, C. A. Flynnc. Lake Parc Place: a study of mixed-income housing [J]. Housing Policy Debate, 1998 (4).
  • 8林南.社会资本:争鸣的范式和实证的检验[J].香港社会学学报,2001,(2):1-38.
  • 9李洁瑾,黄荣贵,冯艾.城市社区异质性与邻里社会资本研究[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),2007,49(5):67-73. 被引量:55
  • 10李志刚,薛德升,魏立华.欧美城市居住混居的理论、实践与启示[J].城市规划,2007,31(2):38-44. 被引量:43

二级参考文献116

共引文献319

同被引文献58

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部