期刊文献+

乳腺癌改良根治术皮瓣厚度选择临床研究 被引量:2

Flap thickness selection in modified radical mastectomy:a clinical study
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨乳腺癌改良根治术中皮瓣厚度的选择,降低术后并发症发生率。方法 对2008年1~12月河南省人民医院乳腺外科78例行乳腺癌改良根治术的临床资料进行回顾性分析。将2008年1~6月的病人设为Haagensen皮瓣组,2008年7~12月的病人设为胸壁浅筋膜外组,对两组病人术中出血量、手术时间及术后并发症发生率进行对比研究。结果 胸壁浅筋膜外组的手术中出血量、手术时间、手术后总引流量及术后皮瓣坏死发生率均低于Haagensen皮瓣组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);手术后皮下积液发生率两组相比差异无统计学意义(P=0.522)。结论 选择在紧贴胸壁浅筋膜浅层外侧的脂肪层中游离皮瓣,可有效降低乳腺癌根治术后并发症发生率。 Objective To explore the selection of flap thickness in modified radical mastectomy and reduce the incidence of postoperative complications. Methods The clinical data of 78 patients with breast cancer performed modified radical mastectomy between January 2008 and December 2008 in the Department of Breast Surgery, the People's Hospital of Henan Province were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into C group (patients from January to June) and S group (patients from July to December). Intraoperative blood loss, operation time and incidence of postoperative complication between two groups were compared. Results Intraoperative blood loss, operation time, postoperative total drainage volume and the incidence of flap necrosis in the S group were lower than those in the C group (P〈0.05). There was no significant difference on the incidence of subcutaneous fluid between two groups(P=0.522). Conclusion Dissociating flap close to the lateral chest wall superficial fascia superficial fat layer can reduce the postoperative complications of radical mastectomy effectively.
出处 《中国实用外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2011年第6期520-522,共3页 Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery
关键词 乳腺癌改良根治术 手术后并发症 皮瓣坏死 皮下积液 modified radical mastectomy postoperative complications flap necrosis seroma
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献18

  • 1王振杰,卞加兴.乳癌根治术皮瓣处理体会[J].中国实用外科杂志,1994,14(7):443-444. 被引量:81
  • 2李建章.431例乳腺癌术后早期并发症的研究[J].中华实验外科杂志,1995,12(4):11-11.
  • 3WUZheng-yan(武正炎).The Complication Prevention and Treatment of General Surgery (普通外科手术并发症预防和处理)[M].Beijing: People''''''''s Military Medical Publisher,2002.113-121.
  • 4BONNEMA J, VAN GEEL A N, LIGTENSTEIN D A, et al. A prospective randomized trial of high versus low vacuum drainage after axillary dissection for breast cancer [J]. Am J Surg, 1997,173(2):76-79.
  • 5SOMERS R G, JABLON Lk, KAPLAN M J, et al. The use of closed suction drainage after lumpectomy and axillary node dissection for breast cancer [J]. Ann Surg, 1992,215(3):146-149.
  • 6CAMERON A E P, EBBS S R, WYLIE F, et al. Suction drainage of the axillary prospective randomized trail [J]. Br J Sury, 1998,75(6):1 211-1 213.
  • 7BARWELL J, CAMPBELL L, WATKINES R M, et al. How long should suction drains stay in after breast surgery with axillary dissection?[J]. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 1997,79(6):435-437.
  • 8SHEN Zhen-zhou, SHAO Zhi-min(沈镇宙,邵志敏). The Recent Progress in Breast Tumor(现代乳腺肿瘤学进展)[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technological Literature Publishing House, 2002.(in Chinese)
  • 9Jain PK, Sow di R, Anderson AD, et al. Randomized clinical trial investigating the use of drains and fibrin sealant following surgery for breast cancer[ J]. Br J Surg,2004,91 ( 1 ) :54 -60.
  • 10Chintamani, Singhal V, Sinjh J, et al. Half versus full vacuum suction drainage after modifide radical mastectomy for breast cancer-a prospective randomized clinical trial [ J ] . BMC Cancer,2005,5(1) :11.

共引文献77

同被引文献8

引证文献2

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部