期刊文献+

圣地亚结构动力学问题模型确认与评估 被引量:3

THE MODEL VALIDATION AND EVALUATION ON THE SANDIA'S STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS CHALLENGE PROBLEM
下载PDF
导出
摘要 考虑模型的不确定性与建模误差等因素,是现代模型确认的研究特点.为了研究现代模型确认过程中的建模、模型确认准则等核心问题,以圣地亚提出的结构动力学挑战问题为研究实例,采用正态分布和非参数核密度估计研究了参数不确定性建模,并且通过所采用的两条确认准则对所建立的数学模型进行了确认研究,并最终得到了较好的数学模型.通过该实例的具体开展,发现联合使用多条确认准则可对所建原始模型进行更科学的评估确认. The modern model validation considers uncertainty and the modeling error.In order to study modeling and validation criterions in the model validation course,in this paper,the normal distribution and nonparametric kernel density estimate(KDE) are adopted to test the uncertain modeling by an example of the Sandia's structural dynamics challenge problem.At the same time,two validation criterions are adopted for model validation to obtain a better model.It is shown that by combining two validation criterions in the processes of model validation,better results can be expected.
出处 《力学与实践》 CSCD 北大核心 2011年第3期50-55,共6页 Mechanics in Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金委员会一中国工程物理研究院联合基金(10876100) 中国工程物理研究院重点基金(2010A0203007)资助项目
关键词 结构动力学 模型确认 不确定性 确认准则 建模 structural dynamics model validation uncertainty validation criterion modeling
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Imregun M, Visser WJ. A review of model updating techniques. The Shock and Vibration Digest, 1991, 23:9-20.
  • 2张令弥,何柏庆.利用试验数据的结构动力学数学模型修正统一方法[J].南京航空航天大学学报,1995,27(1):33-41. 被引量:8
  • 3Ladeveze P, Puel G, Deraemaeker A, et al. Validation of structural dynamics models containing uncertainties. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2006, 195(4): 373-393.
  • 4Moens D, Vandepitte D. A survey of non-probabilistic un- certainty treatment in finite element analysis. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 194(12): 1527-1555.
  • 5郭勤涛,张令弥.结构动力学有限元模型确认方法研究[J].应用力学学报,2005,22(4):572-578. 被引量:32
  • 6Red-Horse JR, Paez TL. Sandia National Laboratories val- idation workshop: structural dynamics application. In: Validation Methodology Workshop at Sandia National Laboratories, March 7, 2006, http://www.esc.sandia.gov/ VCWwebsit e/vcwOverviewAndGoals .html.
  • 7Zang C, Schwingshackl CW, Ewins DJ. Model validation for structural dynamic analysis: an approach to the sandia structural dynamics challenge. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2008, 197(29): 2645- 2659.
  • 8Horta LG, Kenny SP, Crespo LG, et al. NASA Lang- ley's approach to the Sandia's structural dynamics challenge problem. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2008, 197(29): 2607-2620.
  • 9McFarland J, Mahadevan S. Error and variability char- acterization in structural dynamics modeling. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2008, 197(29): 2621-2631.
  • 10Brian MR. Computational modeling issues and methods for the "regulatory problem" in engineering - Solutions to the structural dynamics and static frame problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineer- ing, 2008, 197(29): 2632-2644.

二级参考文献12

  • 1Rebba R; Mahadevan S; Zhang R. Validation of uncertainty propagation models [ A ]. Proceedings of the 44tb AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures[ C ]. Norfolk VA USA: Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, 2003:4671-4678.
  • 2Chen G, Ewins D J. Verification of FE models for structural dynamics[ A ]. Proceedings of IMAC - ⅪⅩ [ C ]. Kissimmee Florida USA :The 19th International Modal Analysis Conference, 2001 : 385-391.
  • 3Guo Qntao, Zhang lingmi. Finite element model updating based on response surface methodology [ A ]. Proceedings of IMAC - ⅩⅫ[ C ]. Dearborn USA: The 22nd international Modal Analysis Conferenee, 2004 : 306 - 309.
  • 4Haugen E B. Probabilistic mechanical design[ hi]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1980; 29-47.
  • 5MontgometyDC.实验没计与分析[M].北京:中国统计出版社,1998.559-564.
  • 6Hasselman T K, Anderson M C, Wenshui G. Priucipal Components Analysis For Nonlinear Model, Correlation, Updating and Uncertainty Evaluatiou[A]. Proceedings of IMAC - ⅩⅥ[C]. Sauta Barbara CA USA: The 16th International Modal Analysis Conference, 1998:664-651.
  • 7M.ttcrshcad J E, Friswell M I. Model updating in structurc dynamics: a survey[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 1993, 167 (2) :347 - 375.
  • 8ltcmcz F M, Doebling S W. Valididation of structural dynamics models at Los Alamos National Laboratory [ A ]. Proceedings of the 41st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures[C]. Atlanta GA, USA:Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, AIAA-2000-1437,2000:749-760.
  • 9Hemez F M, Doebling S W. Model validation and uncertainty quantification[ A ]. Proceedings of IMAC - ⅪⅩ [ C ]. Kissimmee Florida USA: The 19th International Modal Analysis Conference, 2001:1153-1158.
  • 10Alvin K F, Oberkampf W L, Diesert K V, et al. Uncertainty quantification in computational structural dynamics: A new paradigm for model validation [ A ]. Proceedings of IMAC-ⅩⅥ [ C ]. Santa Barbara, CA, USA: The 16th International Modal Analysis Conference,1998: 1191-1197.

共引文献36

同被引文献47

引证文献3

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部