期刊文献+

多维IRT与单维IRT在多维量表中应用的差异 被引量:5

The Difference between Unidimensional IRT and Multidimensional IRT in the Application of Multidimensional Scale
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨单维条目反应理论与多维条目反应理论在多维量表分析中的差异,并从中找出较优的分析方法。方法用单维分部评分模型(PCM)和多维分部评分模型分别对世界卫生组织生存质量研究小组提供的来自世界20个研究中心的WHOQOL-OLD量表数据进行条目和量表结构的分析。结果 "感觉能力"领域中的条目OLD_10"您的感觉功能的问题影响您和他人交往的能力吗?"同时不拟合两种模型,单维IRT得到Infit和Outfit均方拟合指数、6个维度的信度系数及潜在特质间的相关系数均低于多维IRT。结论多维IRT更适合于条目数较少的多维量表的分析和评价。 Objective To explore the difference between unidimensional IRT and multidimensional IRT in the application of scale which includes several subscales and find out the better method.Methods The data of WHOQOL-OLD came from the field study of 20 national study centers of WHOQOL Group which was conducted.The Unidimensional Partial Credit Model and Multidimensional Partial Credit Model were used to analyze the property of items and construct of scale.Results Item OLD_10(Problems with sensory functioning affect ability to interact) in the "Sensory Abilities" domain showed poorer fit to two models.And the Infit and Outfit Mnsq,reliability coefficients and correlation coefficients of latent ability of six domains from unidimensional IRT analysis all were lower than that of multidimensional IRT analysis.Conclusion Multidimensional IRT is more appropriate than unidimensional IRT for the analysis and evaluation of multidimensional and short scale.
出处 《中国卫生统计》 CSCD 北大核心 2011年第3期226-228,共3页 Chinese Journal of Health Statistics
关键词 多维量表 条目反应理论 多维条目反应理论模型 生存质量 Multidimensional scale Item response theory Multidimensional item response theory model Quality of life
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1韩耀风,郝元涛,方积乾.项目反应理论及其在生存质量研究中的应用[J].中国卫生统计,2006,23(6):562-565. 被引量:24
  • 2Embretson SE,Reise SP. Item response theory for psychologists. Mah- wah, N]: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2000,3-12.
  • 3Power M, Quinn K, Schmidt S, WHOQOL-OLD Group. Development of the WHOQOL-Old module. Qual Life Res ,2005,14 (10) :2197-2214.
  • 4Slocum SL. Assessing unidimensionality of psychological scales:using individual and integrative criteria from factor analysis. 2005.
  • 5Reeves BB, Hays RD, Bjorner JB, et al. Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related Quality of Life item banks: Plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information systems (PRO- MIS). Med Care,2007,45( Supp 1 1 ) :22-31.
  • 6Lai JS, Celia D, Chang CH, et al. Item banking to improve, shorten and computerize self-reported fatigue : an illustration of steps to create a core item bank from the FACIT-Fatigue Scale. Qual Life Res,2003,12(5) : 485-501.
  • 7Prieto L, Alonso J, Lamarca R. Classical test theory versus rasch analysis for quality of life questionnaire reduction. Health Qual Life Outcomes,2003,1 (27) :1-13.
  • 8康春花,辛涛.测验理论的新发展:多维项目反应理论[J].心理科学进展,2010,18(3):530-536. 被引量:35
  • 9Wang WC, Yao G, Tsai YJ, et al. validating, improving reliability, and estimating correlation of the four subscales in the WHOQOL-BREF u sing multidimensional Rasch analysis. Qual Life Res, 2006,15 (4) :607- 620.
  • 10Cheng YY, Wang WC, Ho YH. Multidimensional rasch analysis of a psychological test with multiple subtests:a statistical solution for the bandwidth_fidelity dilemma. Educ Psychol Meas, 2009,69 ( 3 ) : 369- 388.

二级参考文献59

  • 1辛涛.项目反应理论研究的新进展[J].中国考试,2005(7):18-21. 被引量:25
  • 2Ackerman, T. (1996). Graphical representation of multidimensional item response theory analyses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20(4), 311.
  • 3Ackerman, T. A. (1994). Using Multidimensional Item Response Theory to Understand What Items and Tests Are Measuring. Applied Measurement in Education, 7(4), 255-278.
  • 4Ackerman, T. A., Gierl, M. J., & Walker, C. M. (2003). Using multidimensional item response theory to evaluate educational and psychological Tests. MIRT Instructional Module/Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 37-53.
  • 5Beguin, A. A., & Glas, C. A. W. (2001). MCMC estimation and some model-fit analysis of multidimensional IRT models. Psychometrika, 66(4), 541-561.
  • 6Bolt, D. M., & Lall, V. F. (2003). Estimation of compensatory and noncompensatory multidimensional item response models using Markov chain Monte Carlo. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27(6), 395-414.
  • 7Book, R. D., & Aitkin, M. (1981). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 46(4), 443-459.
  • 8Christoffcrsson, A. (1975). Factor analysis of dichotomized variables. Psychometrika, 40(1), 5-32.
  • 9Davey, T., Oshima, T. C., & Lee, K. (1996). Linking multidimensional item calibrations. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20(4), 405-416.
  • 10DeMars, C. E. (2006). Application of the hi-factor multidimensional item response theory model to testlet-based tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43(2), 145-168.

共引文献57

同被引文献62

引证文献5

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部