期刊文献+

论证据决策理论的困境与出路 被引量:2

原文传递
导出
摘要 证据决策理论(evidential decision theory)要求决策者的行动要最大化地满足主体的需求(desira—bility),其方法就是将决策者的决策基于“条件证据期望结果(conditional evidence expected out—comes)”。也就是说,只要先前发生的事件与决策者的期望之间具有高度相关性,
作者 李章吕
出处 《哲学动态》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第6期84-89,共6页 Philosophical Trends
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Paul Horwich, "Decision Theory in Light of Newcomb's Problem", Philosophy of Science, 1985, (52) .
  • 2Simon Burgess, "The Newcomb Problem: an Unqualified Resolution", Synthese, 2004, p. 138.
  • 3[美]斯科特·普劳斯.《决策与判断》,施俊琦等译,人民邮电出版社2004年版,第25页.
  • 4James M. Joyce, The Foundations of Causal Decision Theory, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999, pp. 115 - 116.
  • 5Richard Jeffrey, The Logic of Decision, 2nd edition, Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1983, pp. 8 - 9.
  • 6T. Horgan, "Counterfactuals and Newcomb's Problem", The Journal of Philosophy, 1981, (78) .
  • 7方钦.可能世界中的选择:纽康姆难题[J].社会科学战线,2006(3):38-55. 被引量:2
  • 8B. Armendt, "Impartiality and Causal Decision Theory", PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1988.
  • 9Robert Nozick, The Nature of Rationality, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993, p. 43, p. 45.

二级参考文献32

  • 1汪丁丁.经济学理性主义的基础[J].社会学研究,1998(2):3-13. 被引量:107
  • 2Ross, Kyle, "Analysis of the Newcomb Problem", from website: http://www.osl. iu. edu/-kyross/pub/newcomb.pdf,2003.
  • 3Schlesinger, G. , "The Unpredictability of Free Choices", British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 25 ( 1974 ).
  • 4Schmidt, J. H., "Newcomb' s Paradox Realized with Backward Causation", British Journal for the Philosophy of Science,49(1998).
  • 5Schmidt - Petri, Christoph, "Newcomb' s Problem and Repeated Prisoners' Dilemmas", PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association,2004 contributed paper.
  • 6Sobel, J. H. , "Infallible Predictors", The Philosophical Review ,97 ( 1988 ).
  • 7宾默尔.1994:《博弈论与社会契约:公平博弈》.上海财经大学出版社,2003年版.
  • 8Armendt, B. ," Impartiality and Causal Decision Theory", PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association Vol. 1988.
  • 9Bar - Hillel, M. , and Margalit, A. , "Newcomb ' s Paradox Revisited", British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 23(1972).
  • 10Benditt,T. M. ,and Ross,D. J. , "Newcomb's Paradox" ,British Journal for the Philosophy of Science,27(1976).

同被引文献15

  • 1马小亮,樊春良.基于证据的政策:思想起源、发展和启示[J].科学学研究,2015,33(3):353-362. 被引量:29
  • 2熊立文.贝叶斯决策理论与归纳逻辑[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),2005(2):108-113. 被引量:13
  • 3Bayes T. An Essay Toward Solving a Problem in the Doctrine of Chances [ J ]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal So-eiety of London, 1763,53:370 -418.
  • 4] Joyce J. The Foundations of Causal Decision Theory [ M ]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
  • 5Savage L. The Foundations of Statistics [ M ]. New York: Dover Publications, Inc. 1972.
  • 6Jeffrey R. The Logic of Decision[ M]. New York: McGraw- Hill, 1983.
  • 7Stalnaker R. Letter to David Lewis [ C ]//Harper W, Stal- naker R, Pearce G. Ifs. Dordrecht: Riedel, 1978 : 151 - 152.
  • 8Pollock J. Causal Probability [ J ]. Synthese, 2002,132 : 143 - 185.
  • 9Skyrms B. Causal Decision Theory [ J ]. Journal of Philoso- phy, 1982,79:695 - 711.
  • 10l Lewis D. Causal Decision Theory [ J ]. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 1981,59:5 - 30.

引证文献2

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部