期刊文献+

企业影响政府/行业的能力与新产品绩效关系研究 被引量:11

A study of the relationship between firm's capabilities and new product performance
原文传递
导出
摘要 转型时期的中国,高度不确定的环境往往是因为政府政策和干预行为的连续变化以及高度的行业竞争带来的。基于动态能力的资源观点,企业影响政府的能力和影响行业的能力是企业适应外部环境的动态能力之一,这两种能力可以降低政治环境和市场环境的不确定性,从而提高新产品开发绩效;并且政府干预对两种能力与新产品绩效的关系具有一定的调节作用。应用分层多元回归模型,对陕西省178家企业的问卷调研数据进行分析。研究结果表明,这两种能力对新产品绩效都有积极的促进作用,且两者的交互也将促进新产品绩效;政府干预对两种能力与新产品绩效关系的调节是倒U型的,即适量的政府干预可以促进两种能力与绩效之间的积极关系,而当干预过多,则降低了企业的柔性,削弱了企业对环境的敏感度,从而对两种能力与新产品绩效之间的积极关系产生消极作用。 From resource based dynamic capability perspective,this study argues that in emerging countries such as China,firm's capabilities to influence government and industry are also firm's dynamic ability.The two types of capabilities both could reduce the uncertainty from the government environment and market environment,thereby improving new product performance(NPP).Moreover,government intervention(GI) could moderate the relationship between the two types of capabilities and new product performance.The model is empirically tested using data collected from 296 firms in shaanxi using optimal scaling and multiple regression.The results suggest that the two capabilities and their interaction both improve the performance of new product development.GI moderates the inverse U-shaped relationship between the two capabilities and NPP.When GI is low,it could positively moderate the relationship between the two types of capability and NPP.But when there is too much GI,firm's influence capabilities would constrain the flexibility and thereby hamper NPP.
出处 《科学学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第6期906-913,共8页 Studies in Science of Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71072133) 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(09JZD0030)
关键词 动态能力 企业影响政府 影响行业能力 政府干预 新产品开发绩效 dynamic capability firm's capability to influence policy(IGC) firm's capability to influence industry(IIC) government intervention(GI) new product performance(NPP)
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1Sivadas E, Dwyer R R. An examination of organizational factors influencing new product success in internal and alliance - based processes [ J ]. Journal of Marketing, 2000, 64 (1): 31-49.
  • 2Calantone R J, Schmidt J B, Song X M. Controllable factors of new product success: a cross - national comparison[J]. Marketing Science, 1996, 15 (4): 341 358.
  • 3Pang - Lo Liu, Wen - Chin Chen, Chih - Hung Tsai. An empirical study on the correlation between the knowl- edge management method and new product development strategy on product performance in Taiwan' s industries [J]. Technovation, 2005, 25 (6): 637-644.
  • 4Gima K A,Haiyang Li,De Luca L M. The contingent value of marketing strategy innovativeness for product development performance in Chinese new technology ventures[ J ]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2006, 35(3): 359-372.
  • 5Yuan Li, Yi Liu, Yongbin Zhao. The role of market and entrepreneurship orientation and internal control in the new product development activities of Chinese firms [ J ].Industrial Marketing Management, 2006, 35 ( 3 ) : 336 - 347.
  • 6Gima K A, Murray J Y. Exploratory and exploitative learning in new product development: a social capital perspective on new technology ventures in China [ J ]. Journal of International Marketing, 2007, 15 ( 2 ) : 1 -29.
  • 7Roger Calantone, Rosanna Garcia, Cornelia Droge. The effects of environmental turbulence on new product development strategy planning[ J ]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2003, 20(2): 90- 103.
  • 8Yuanqiong He, Zhilong Tian. Government -oriented corporate public relation strategies in transitional China [ J]. Management and Organization Review, 2008, 4 (3): 367 -391.
  • 9Wai - sum Siu, Tingling Lin, Wenchang Fang, Zhi Chao Liu. An institutional analysis of the new product development process of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in China, Hong Kong and Taiwan[J]. Indus- trial Marketing Management, 2006, 35 ( 3 ) : 323 -335.
  • 10Julie Juan Li, Laurapoppo, Kevin Zheng Zhou. Do managerial ties in China always produce value? competi- tion, uncertainty, and domestic vs. foreign firms [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 2008, 29 (4): 383 - 400.

二级参考文献17

  • 1赵孟营.组织合法性:在组织理性与事实的社会组织之间[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),2005(2):119-125. 被引量:72
  • 2杨东进.中国轿车行业中的政府蔽荫:来源、发展及其危害[J].企业经济,2007,26(2):94-96. 被引量:1
  • 3高丙中.社会团体的合法性问题.中国社会科学,2000,(2):100-109.
  • 4Scott W.R..从制度上看变化中的中国企业.见:徐淑英.中国企业管理的前沿研究.北京:北京大学出版社,2004:54-72.
  • 5Droege S., Johnson N. B.. Broken Rules and Constrained Confusion: Toward a Theory of Meso-institutions. Management and Organization Review, 2007, 3(1): 81-104.
  • 6Peter D.S.,Kyungmook L..大型律师事务所的制度变迁:从资源依赖理论和制度学说角度进行的考察.见:徐淑英,张维迎.美国管理学会学报最佳论文集萃.北京:北京大学出版社,2006:280-316.
  • 7DiMaggio, E J., Powell, W. W.. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 1983, (48): 147-160.
  • 8Meyer, J. W., Rowan, B.. Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 1977, (83): 340-363.
  • 9Peng M. W.. Towards an Institution-based View of Business Strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2002, (19): 251-267.
  • 10Leblebici H., Salancik G., Copay A., King, T.. Institutional Change and the Transformation of Interorganizational Fields: An Organizational History of the U.S. Radio Broadcasting Industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1991, (36): 333-363.

共引文献7

同被引文献206

引证文献11

二级引证文献94

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部