期刊文献+

对隐喻意义五种解读结果的认知研究

A Cognitive Study of Five Results in Metaphor Interpretation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 隐喻及意义的成功解读,需要受喻者与施喻者的视阈融合。从施喻者的隐喻构建到受喻者的隐喻解读,存在一个视角转换过程。在这个过程中,由于受到语境、人生经验、背景知识、文化差异、理解力和感悟力等诸多因素的影响,会出现正确解读、错误解读、零解读、多种解读和故意曲解五种解读结果。 The successful interpretation of metaphoric meaning requires fusion of horizons from both the addresser and the addressee.In the process of perspective transference,affected by factors such as context,life experience,background knowledge,cultural difference,comprehension ability,etc.,there will be at least five interpretation results,namely,right interpretation,unconscious wrong interpretation,zero interpretation,multi-interpretation and conscious wrong interpretation.
作者 伍智敏
出处 《黑龙江教育学院学报》 2011年第5期146-149,共4页 Journal of Heilongjiang College of Education
关键词 隐喻解读 正确解读 错误解读 零解读 多种解读 故意曲解 metaphor interpretation right interpretation unconscious wrong interpretation zero interpretation multi-interpretation conscious wrong interpretation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Fauconnier,G.& Turner,M.Blending as a central process of grammar[G]//Irt Adele Goldberg (ed.).Conceptual Structure,Discourse and Language.Stanford:CSL I Publications,1996.
  • 2王文斌.受喻者的主体性及主体自洽[J].外国语,2006,29(6):34-39. 被引量:47
  • 3Richards,I.A.The Philosophy of Rhetoric[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,1936.
  • 4Lakoff,G.& Johnson,M.Metaphors we Live by[M].Chicago:Chicago University Press,1980.
  • 5王文斌.施喻者的认知聚焦方式[J].外语与外语教学,2006(4):1-3. 被引量:21
  • 6束定芳.隐喻学研究[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社,1999:63-69.

二级参考文献13

  • 1伽达默尔.真理与方法[M].上海:上海译文出版社,2004..
  • 2Fauconnier, G. Mappings in Thought and Language [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
  • 3Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner. The Way We Think [ M]. New York: Basic Books, 2002.
  • 4Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. Metaphors We Live By [M]. Chlcago: Chicago University Press, 1980.
  • 5Langacker, R. W. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Vols. Ⅱ [ M]. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1991.
  • 6Fauconnier, G. Mappings in Thought and Language[ M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.104-105.
  • 7Fauconnier, G, & M, Turner. Blending as a central process of grammar [ A ]. Adele Goldberg. Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language [ C ]. Stanford: GSLI Publications, 1996.113 - 129.
  • 8Fauconnler, G. & M. Turner. The Way We Think [ M]. New York: Basic Books, 2002.174-175.
  • 9Grady, H.H. & S. Wells. 2004. Toward a rhetoric of intersubjectivity: introducing Jurgen Habermas. http:// jac.gsu. edu/jac/6/Articles/3.htm.
  • 10Lakoff, G, & M. Johnson, Metaphors we Live by [ M]. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1980.

共引文献69

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部