期刊文献+

规模经营形式下的农民权益保护——以农民与村委会的关系为切入点 被引量:2

Protecting Farmers' Interests and Rights within the Form of Scale Management——Taking the Relation between the Farmers and the Committee of the Village as the Breakthrough Point
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在土地由分散经营转为规模经营的过程中,农民的权益最有可能遭到侵害。不管隐形或幕后的侵权源头是何方主体,最有可能对农民权益的直接侵害人是农村土地发包方的机关——村委会。文章认为,在土地规模经营的进程中,村委会在利益的驱使下出现异化,成为三重代理人,扮演"圈地运动"先锋的角色。通过对土地规模经营的认真反思,文章认为,明确农民在土地规模经营过程中的选择权和主导权,分析村委会与村民之间的权利义务关系,并在村委会侵权的现实情形下,明确村民的权利救济途径对于农民权益的保护具有重要的理论和现实意义。 In the transformation progress from disperse management to scale management of farmland, farmers' interests and rights are most likely to be violated. Whoever the invisible or behind-the-scenes subject of the original infringement is, the most possible direct infringer to the interests and rights of the farmers is the mean institution of the party awarding the contract of the land which is the Committee of the Village. The author considers that under the circumstances of scale management of land, the Committee of the Village driven by the interests may be dissimilated and become the triplex agent, playing the role as the pioneer of "The Enclusure Movement". By earnest rethinking of the scale management of land, this article believes that there is a fundamental theory effect on protecting the interests and rights of the farmers by specifying the rights of electing and leading of the scale management of farmland as well as analyzing the relation of the rights and obligations between the villagers and the Committee of the Village. At the same time, under the current circumstances of infringement of the Committee of the Village, there is a practical significance to protecting farmers' basic rights by clearing the redress approaches of the rights of the villagers.
作者 吴小兵
出处 《中国农业大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2011年第2期24-32,共9页 Journal of China Agricultural University;Social Sciences
关键词 异化 组织型规模经营 技术型规模经营 选择权 主导权 Dissimilated Organized-scale management Techniquescale management Option Initiative rights
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1新华网.全国各地纷纷探索土地流转新模式.(2008-10-10)[2011-01-30].http://sh.villachina.com/2008-10-10/2140128.htm.
  • 2贺雪峰.为什么村委会或农民协会不能维护农民利益[J].江苏社会科学,2004(4):12-13. 被引量:22
  • 3成思危.救美就算了吧,先反腐吧.(2008-11-23)[2011-01-30].http:∥WWW.chinaelections.org/NewsInfo.asp?NewsID=138299.
  • 4叶琪,涂远宏.农村土地规模经营模式比较与选择探析[J].农村经济与科技,2005,16(8):6-7. 被引量:9
  • 5秋风.农民才是流转土地的权利主体.(2008-12-09)[2011-01-30].http:/WWW.civillaw.com.cn/article/default.asp.9id=42158.
  • 6北大法律信息网.浙江省乐清市乐城镇石马村村民委员会与浙江顺益房地产开发有限公司合作开发房地产合同纠纷案.(2007-09-30)[2011-01-30].http://vip.chinalawinfo.com/newlaw2002/slc/slc.asp?db=fnl&gid=117563912.
  • 7许志永.“上访村”是一种社会病[J].百姓,2003,10:23-23.

共引文献29

同被引文献36

引证文献2

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部