期刊文献+

不同所有制及领导模式下主导厂商兼并行为研究——对我国煤炭业兼并重组方案的评价与启示 被引量:4

The Merging Behavior of the Dominant Firm under Different Ownership Structures and Leadership Modes:Implications for Coal Resources Rearrangement Projects in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文构建了具有成本差异的主导-跟随厂商兼并模型,分别考察了不同所有制及领导模式下,我国煤炭行业主导厂商兼并的动机与能力。研究结果表明,在价格领导模式下,私有的主导厂商有动机且有能力对行业中的全部跟随企业进行兼并,但兼并有损于社会福利;在产量领导模式下,行业整合能改进社会福利,但只有国有主导厂商可能对跟随企业完全兼并,主导厂商与跟随厂商之间的成本差异是影响其兼并能力的关键因素。基于模型分析结果,认为我国现行的煤炭业重组方案是在既定市场结构和产权结构下行业进化的必然选择。 This study builds a dominant- follower model with different costs to explore the merging behaviors of public and private firms of coal industry in China. The results show that, the private dominant firm will and can merge all followers under pricing leadership ; but from view of social welfare, the merging is harmful. Under output leadership, the merging can improve welfare; but only public dominant firm maybe merge all followers and the feasibility is affected by cost difference between dom- inant and follower firms. Based on the results of these analyses, with current leadership modes and ownership structures, we believe that coal resources rearrangement projects in our country are inevitable choices of industrial revolution.
出处 《产业经济研究》 CSSCI 2011年第3期20-28,共9页 Industrial Economics Research
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"中国煤电产业链规制方案研究--目标与路径选择"(项目编号:70673319) 上海市教委重点学科建设项目"经济系统运行与调控"(项目编号:J50504)
关键词 主导-跟随厂商 价格领导 产量领导 混合寡头 煤炭业兼并 dominant-follower firms pricing leadership output leadership mixed oligopoly merging in coal industry
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1王宏英,高峰.山西煤矿兼并重组整合跟踪研究与对策建议[J].中国煤炭,2010,36(11):5-8. 被引量:6
  • 2云凌志,王凤生.混合寡占之下的负外部性对策:国有化兼并还是行政监管——兼评山西省煤炭业资源重组方案[J].中国工业经济,2010(1):124-134. 被引量:11
  • 3Salant, S. W. , S. Switzer and R. J. Reynolds, 1983, "Losses from Horizontal Merger: The Effects of an Exogenous Change in Industry Structure on Coumot-Nash Equilibrium", Quarterly Journal of Economics ,98 (2) :185-199.
  • 4Perry, M. K. and Porter, R. H. , 1985," Oligopoly and the Incentive for Horizontal Merger", The American Economic Review ,75 ( 1 ) :219-227.
  • 5Rassenti, S. J. and B. J. Wilson,2004 ," How Applicable Is the Dominant Firm Model of Price Leadership?", Experimental Economics ,7:271-288.
  • 6[美]范立安,著.费方域,等译.微观经济学:现代观点[M].上海:上海三联书店,上海人民出版社,1998.
  • 7Gilbert, R. J. , 1978," Dominant Firm Pricing Policy in a Market for an Exhaustible Resource", The Bell Journal of Economics,9 (2) :385-395.
  • 8Foros, O. , Kind, H. J. and G. Shaffer,2011 ," Resale Price Maintenance and Restrictions on Dominant Firm and Industry-wide Adoption", International Journal of Industrial Organization ,29:179-186.
  • 9Yamawaki, H. , 1985," Dominant Firm Pricing and Fringe Expansion: The Case of the US Iron and Steel Industry: 1907 -1930 ", The Review of Economics and Statistics,67 (3) :429-437.
  • 10Blank, L. , Kaserman, D. L. and J. W. Mayo,1998 ,"Dominant Firm Pricing with Competitive Entry and Regulation:The Case of IntraLATA Toll", Journal of Regulation Economics, 14:35-53.

二级参考文献33

  • 1Beato, P., A. Mas-Colell. The Marginal Cost Pricing as a Regulation Mechanism in Mixed Markets[A]. Merchand, M., P. Pestieau, H. Tulkens. The Performance of Public Enterprises[C]. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1984.
  • 2Cremer, H., M. Marchand, J-F. Thisse. The Public Firm as an Instrument for Regulating an Oligopolistic Market[J]. Oxford Economic Papers, 1989, (41).
  • 3De Fraja, G., F. Delbono. Game Theoretic Models of Mixed Oligopoly [J]. Journal of Economic Surveys, 1989, (4).
  • 4Fershtman, C. The Interdependence between Ownership Status and Market Structure: The Case of Privafizafion [J]. Economica, 1990,(57).
  • 5Harris, R.G., E.G. Wiens. Government Enterprise: An Instrument for the Internal Regulation of Industry[J]. Canadian Journal of Economics, 1980, (13).
  • 6Matsumura, T. Partial Privatization in Mixed Duopoly[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 1998, (70).
  • 7Wang, L.F.S., Chen, T. L. Privatization, Efficiency Gain, and Subsidization with Excess Taxation Burden: A Relevance Result[R]. Working Paper, 2009.
  • 8Wang, L.F.S., Wang, Y.C., Zhao, L. Privatization and Efficiency Gain in an International Mixed Oligopoly with Asymmetric Costs[J]. Japanese Economic Review, 2009a, 60(4).
  • 9Wang, L.F.S., Wang, Y.C., Zhao, L. Privatization and the Environment in a Mixed Oligopoly with Pollution Abatement[J]. Economics Bulletin, 2009b, 29(4).
  • 10Wang, L.F.S., Wang, J. Environmental Taxes in a Differentiated Mixed Duopoly[J]. Economic Systems, 2009, 33(4).

共引文献46

同被引文献49

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部