期刊文献+

中国碳排放权在国际交易中形成价格落差的原因探析——基于MAC的视角 被引量:2

Analysis on the Reasons of Price Scissors on Carbon Emission Rights between China and Abroad: from the Prospect of MAC
下载PDF
导出
摘要 自2005年《京都议定书》协议下的碳交易走向实际操作阶段以来,国际碳交易价格在发达国家和发展中国家之间出现了巨额剪刀差。文章依照双边交易模型理论分析了国际碳交易结束在各国边际减排成本均衡点,分析了目前出现价格剪刀差的原因,提出中国应加快建设自愿碳排放市场并设立碳排放权储备池。 Since carbon trade came into practice under the Kyoto Protocol in 2005,huge price scissors exist on carbon permits price between the developing countries and the developed countries.This paper analyses the break-even point of marginal abatement costs when the international carbon trade is over based on the bilateral trade model theory,points out the reasons of the price scissors,and suggests that China should spur to build voluntary carbon market and set up a reserve pond for carbon emission permits.
出处 《上海立信会计学院学报》 北大核心 2011年第3期66-71,共6页 Journal of Shanghai Lixin University of Commerce
基金 教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目(10YJA790221) 上海市社科规划项目(2010BGJ001)
关键词 边际减排成本 碳排放权交易 碳排放权储备池 国际价格理论 marginal abatement cost trade of carbon emission rights reserve pond of carbon emission rights international price theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Ellerman A D, Decaux A. Analysis of post-kyoto CO2 emissions trading using marginal abatement curves [ EB/OL ]. Http ://web. mit. edu/globlalchange/www/ MITJPSPGC_Rpt40. pdf.
  • 2Ciorba, U. , Lanza, A. , Pauli, F. Kyoto Protocol an emission trading: Does the US make a difference? [ R ]. Milan : FEEM working paper,2001.
  • 3Eyckmans,J. , Van Regemorter,D. , Van Steenberghe, V. Is Kyoto fatally flawed? An analysis with MacGEM,Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Applied Economic Sciences [ R ]. Working Paper NO. 2001 - 18,2001.
  • 4Holtsmark, B. , Maestad, O. Emissions trading under the Kyoto Protocol. Effects on fossil fuel markets under alternative regimes[ J]. Energy Policy,2002,30:207 - 218.
  • 5Jotzo,F. , Michaelowa, A. Estimating the CDM market under the Marrakeeh Accords [ J ]. Climate Policy, 2002,2 : 179 - 196.
  • 6Loschel, A., Zhang, Z. X. The economic and environmental implications of the US repudiation of the Kyoto Protocol and the subsequent deals in Bonn and Marrakech [ J ]. Wehwirtschaftlich. Arch, 2002. 138 : 711 -746.
  • 7Haites, E. , Mullins F. Linking domestic and industry greenhouse gas emission trading systems [ J ]. International Energy Agency, International Emissions Trading Association, Paris. 2001.
  • 8Bahn, O., Barreto, L., Kypreos, S. Modelling and assessing inter-regional trade of CO2 emission reduction units [ J ]. Environ. Model. Assess, 2001, 6:173 - 182.
  • 9Bosello F, Rosen R. Carbon emissions trading and equity in international agreements [ J ]. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 2002,7 ( 1 ) :29 - 37.
  • 10Rehdanz, K., Tol, R. S. J. Unilateral regulation of bilateral trade in greenhouse gas emission permits [ J ]. Ecological Economics,2005,54 (4) : 397 - 416.

同被引文献11

引证文献2

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部