期刊文献+

HEC-RAS洪水演进模型的应用 被引量:13

Application of HEC-RAS Flood Routing Model in the Three Gorges Reservoir
下载PDF
导出
摘要 上游入库洪水在三峡库区向下游传播的过程中,受到库区的调蓄作用,洪峰削减明显。同时由于区间入流的影响,库区的调蓄作用被掩盖,这为研究洪水在库区行进中所受的调蓄作用带来了困难。应用在三峡库区建立的HEC-RAS洪水演进模型,模拟1989年-2000年间209场洪水在不考虑区间入流时向下游传播的过程,并检验洪水传播时间,其中洪水波行进时间用上下游洪水过程线的时间重心之差表示。按照库区5个水文站位置将库区分为4段分别检验。将HEC-RAS模型应用于三峡水库2006年和2007年蓄水期库区水位的模拟,结果表明,蓄水期水位变化过程得到了较好的模拟,对最高水位的模拟误差可控制在0.2 m之内。并应用该模型,分析和比较了库区4个部分对洪峰的削减作用。 During the routing process to the lower reach of the Three Gorges Reservoir, the peak of flood generated in the upper watershed of the reservoir decreased as the storage effect of the reservoir. The decrease was masked by the lateral runoff from the Three Gorges Area,which hinders the research of the storage effect that the flood received. Based on the HEC-RAS flood routing model applied in the reservoir, 209 events during 1989 to 2000 were simulated. Simulated routing time was verified with the observed and recorded routing time, in which routing time was calculated by the time moment difference between the hydrograph of the upper and lower cross section. The verification was carried out in the four parts of the mainstream, which was divided by 5 gauge stations. The model was also applied to simulate the reservoir stage during the water storage period from 2006 to 2007. The results showed that the stage process was simulated accurately, in which the highest stage error was within 0. 2 meter. The model was then applied to simulate the flood peak decreasing in the four parts of the reservoir to analysis the storage effect difference among the different reservoir parts.
出处 《南水北调与水利科技》 CAS CSCD 2011年第3期24-27,共4页 South-to-North Water Transfers and Water Science & Technology
基金 “十一五”国家科技支撑计划项目(2008BAB29B09)
关键词 三峡水库 水位模拟 调蓄 洪峰削减 洪水传播时间 洪水演进 HEC-RAS Three Gorges Reservoir stage simulation storage effect flood peak decrease routing time flood routing HEC-RAS
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1张瑞芳.长江三峡洪水预报系统简介[J].水利水电技术,1994,25(9):48-53. 被引量:2
  • 2Hydrologic Engineering Center. Hydrologic reference manual [R]. U. S. Army Corps of Engineering,USA,2002.
  • 3Hydrologic Engineering Center. HEG RAS user's manual [R]. U. S. Army Corps of Engineering, USA, 2006.
  • 4周建军.三峡水库蓄水后水库、径流、泥沙、运行和水库泥沙数学模型验证等相关问题研究[R].清华大学水利系研究报告,2005.
  • 5Rouger Moussa. Analytical Hayami Solution for the Diffusive Wave Flood Routing Problem with Lateral Inflow [J].Hydrological Processes, 1996, (10) : 1209-1227.
  • 6Tommaso Moramarco, Silvia Barbettal, Florisa Melone. A Realtime Stage Muskingum Forecasting Model for a Sitewithout Rating Curve[J]. Hydrological Sciences - Journal - des Sci enees Hydrologiques,2006,51(1) :66-82.
  • 7Parthasarathi Choudhury. Multiple Inflows Muskingum Routing Model[J]. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering,2007,12(5) :473-481.
  • 8李玉荣,闵要武,邹红梅.三峡工程蓄水水文特性变化浅析[J].水文,2009,29(4):37-39. 被引量:14
  • 9郭遁辉 周瑾.长江三峡地区1982年7月暴雨洪水分析.水文,1984,(1):55-59.

二级参考文献7

  • 1中国长江三峡开发总公司.三峡工程水文预报及设计洪水文集[C].1994.
  • 2长江水利委员会水文局.长江水利委员会江务局.长江防汛水情手册[R].2002.
  • 3孟春红,赵冰.三峡水库蓄水后水文特性和污染因素分析[J].人民长江,2007,38(8):26-27. 被引量:8
  • 4王厥谋,张瑞芳,徐贯午.综合约束线性系统模型[J]水利学报,1987(07).
  • 5文康,梁庚辰.总径流线性响应模型与线性扰动模型[J]水利学报,1986(06).
  • 6王厥谋,张瑞芳,徐贯午.约束线性系统模型及其在汉江流域洪水预报中的应用[J]水文,1985(01).
  • 7黄忠新,韩庆菊,李春香,虞海平.三峡水库156m蓄水宜昌站水文特性与水情预报[J].人民长江,2008,39(13):5-7. 被引量:3

共引文献14

同被引文献101

引证文献13

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部