期刊文献+

为提喻正名——认知语义学视角下的提喻和转喻 被引量:13

Let Synecdoche Stand Alone:Its Distinction from Metonymy in Light of Cognitive Semantics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着认知语言学的兴起和发展,人们对隐喻、转喻等传统辞格产生了革命性的新认识,而同属传统辞格的提喻除偶尔在认知语言学研究中当作转喻的一个下属分支外鲜被提及。文章认为,提喻和转喻并不是纯粹的从属关系,它们的认知基础相似但本质上有所不同,提喻反映了一种相对独特的认知方式。研究突破修辞学和认知语言学对提喻的通常看法,依据认知语义学理论的基本观点,结合认知语用学中的关联理论,厘清提喻与和转喻的关系,认为从认知和修辞角度将提喻从转喻中独立出来具有重要的语言学和认知科学意义。 Cognitive Linguistics has shed new light on the interpretation of some traditional figures of speech such as metaphor and metonymy.Relatively speaking,synecdoche has attracted far less attention although it is also a traditional rhetorical device.It is to be contended here that contrary to the popular belief that it is one sub-category of metonymy,synecdoche is in fact a separate category parallel to metaphor and metonymy because it has a fundamentally different cognitive basis and corresponds to a unique manner of cognition.In accordance with some basic arguments of cognitive semantics and on the strength of Relevance Theory,we draw a demarcation line between metonymy and synecdoche and highlight the linguistic and cognitive implications of such a distinction.
出处 《语言科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第1期93-100,共8页 Linguistic Sciences
基金 教育部"新世纪优秀人才支持计划"项目"语用身份与语言交际"的部分成果
关键词 提喻 转喻 隐喻 认知语义学 synecdoche metonymy metaphor cognitive semantics
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献39

  • 1刘正光.名词动用过程中的隐喻思维[J].外语教学与研究,2000,32(5):335-339. 被引量:113
  • 2刘正光,周红民.惯用语理解的认知研究[J].外语学刊,2002(2):7-14. 被引量:45
  • 3刘正光.莱柯夫隐喻理论中的缺陷[J].外语与外语教学,2001(1):25-29. 被引量:54
  • 4[1]Barcelona,A. On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor[A].Barcelona.Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads[C].Berlin/ New York: Moulton de Gruyter,2000.
  • 5[2]Hopper,P.& Traugott, E. Grammaticalization[M].Cambridge:CUP,1993.
  • 6[3]Kovecses,Z.Metaphor:A Practical Introduction[M].Oxford:OUP,2002.
  • 7[4]Lakoff,G.Woman,Fire and Dangerous Things[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1987.
  • 8[5]Lakoff,G.and M.Johnson.Metaphors We Live By[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1980.
  • 9[6]Langacker,R.Grammar and Conceptualization[M].Berlin/New York:Moulton de Gruyter,1999.
  • 10[7]Langacker,R.Topic,subject and possessor[A].Simonsen & Endresen.A Cognitive Approach to the Verb:Morphorlogical and Constructional Perspectives[C].Berlin/New York:Moulton de Gruyter,2001.

共引文献227

同被引文献118

引证文献13

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部