期刊文献+

限价订单簿的价格发现功能——基于上海证券交易所Level-2行情数据的实证研究

下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于上海证券交易所Level-2行情数据,本文采用Hasbrouck信息份额方法估计了最优买卖报价、最近成交价及第2至第10档次优买卖报价对价格发现的贡献度,尤其关注次优限价订单对资产有效价格的解释能力。研究结果表明:最优限价订单的贡献度最大,在价格发现中提供了63.82%的信息份额;最近成交价的贡献度为14.76%;次优限价订单有助于价格发现,其贡献度为21.43%;次优限价订单的信息含量随订单主动性的下降而递减;随着交易活跃度的下降,投资者更倾向于提交限价订单,从而导致次优限价订单包含更多信息价值;次优限价订单的信息含量随公司规模和Beta系数的上升而单调下降。
作者 叶军
出处 《世界经济情况》 2011年第5期75-83,共9页 World Economic Outlook
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Demsetz H. The cost of transacting [J].Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1968(82) : 33-53.
  • 2Hasbrouck J. One security, many markets: Determining the contributions to price discovery [J]. Journal of Finance, 1995 (50):1175-1199.
  • 3Parlour C. Price dynamics in limit order markets [J]. Review of Financial Studies, 1998(11) : 789-816.
  • 4Cohen K, Maier S, Schwartz R, Whitcomb D. Transactioncosts,order placement strategy,and existence of the bid-ask spread[J].Journal of Political Economy, 1981 (89) : 287-305.
  • 5Foucault T. Order flow composition and trading costs in a dynamic limit order market[J].Journal of Financial Markets, 1999(2) :99-134.
  • 6Glosten L R. 1994, Is the electronic open limit order book inevitable?[J].Journal of Finance, 1994 (49) : 1127-1161.
  • 7Rock K. The specialist's order book and price anomalies[J]. working paper. Harvard University, 1996.
  • 8Harris L. Does a large minimum price variation encourage order exposure? working paper, University of Southern California, 1998.
  • 9韩千山.大股东讯息优势、股票质押与下单策略[D],国立台湾大学财务金融研究所博士论文,2000.
  • 10Angel, J. (1997). Limit versus market orders (working paper). Georgetown University.

二级参考文献23

  • 1汪炜,周宇.中国股市“规模效应”和“时间效应”的实证分析——以上海股票市场为例[J].经济研究,2002,37(10):16-21. 被引量:94
  • 2Bailey, W, Cai, J, Cheung, Y L, and Zheng, Z, 2003, "The Cross-sectional Determinants of Stock Returns in China: Further Evidence on Characteristics, Fac~rs, and Momentum", Working Paper, Cornell University.
  • 3Daniel, Kent D, and Sheridan Titman, 1997, "Evidence on the Characteristics of Cross-sectional Variation in Common Stock Returns",Journal of Finance, 52, 1-33.
  • 4Daniel, Kent D , and Sheridan Titman, 1998, "Characteristics or Covariances?", Journal of Portfolio Management, 24, 24-33.
  • 5Daniel, Kent D, Sheridan Titman, and John Wei, 2001, "Explaining the Cross-section of Stock Returns in Japan: Factors or Characteristics?", Journal of Finance, 56, 743-766.
  • 6Davis, James, Eugene F Fama, and Kenneth R French, 2000,"Characteristics, Covariances, and Average Returns: 19"29-1997",Journal of Finance, 55, 389-406.
  • 7Fama, Eugene F , and Kenneth R French, 1996, "Multifactor Explanations of Asset Pricing Anomalies", Journal of Finance, 51, 55-84.
  • 8Lakonishok, Josef, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert W Vishny, 1994, "Contranian Investment, Extrapolation, and Risk", Journal of Finance,49, 1541-1578.
  • 9Lewellen, Jaonathan, 1999,"The Time-series Relations among Expected Return, Risk, Book-to-market", Jurnal of Financial Economics, 54.
  • 10O' Hara M. Market Microstructure Theory[ M ]. Cambridge : Basil Blackwell, 1995.

共引文献156

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部