期刊文献+

试论南朝檄移文 被引量:1

A Comparative Study of the Official Persuasive Writings and Denunciation Essays of the Southern Dynastie
下载PDF
导出
摘要 南朝檄文、移文数量不多,二者性质相似又有区别。就功能而言,檄文主要用于军事方面,移文还可用于朝臣围绕国事而展开的讨论,重在阐明自身旨意,以达晓喻对方之目的;就适用对象看,檄文常针对违逆之人而作,移文则用于政见初异而终同之人。南朝檄移文以俪体行文,具有较高的美学价值。 Denunciation essays and official persuasive writings of the Southern dynasties had some similarities and differences between them. With respect to functions,denunciation essays were mainly used for military purposes while persuasive writings were used in discussions of state affairs with the author's fellow ministers, focusing on the intentions of the author and persuading his colleagues. In terms of applicable objects, denunciation essays were often against wrong-doers while official persuasive essays aimed at ministers whose politics disagreed with the author in the beginning but ended up the same. Such essays adopted the parallel style and were of high aesthetic value.
作者 刘涛
出处 《五邑大学学报(社会科学版)》 2011年第2期68-71,95,共4页 Journal of Wuyi University(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 南朝檄移文 军事文书 明白晓畅 骈体 审美 denunciation essays and persuasive essays of the Southern dynasties period military instruments intelligible the parallel style aesthetics
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1徐师曾.文体明辨序说[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1962..
  • 2刘勰 范文澜注.文心雕龙注[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1958..
  • 3严可均.全上古三代秦汉三国六朝文[M].北京:中华书局,1958..
  • 4林纾.春觉斋论文[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1959.82.
  • 5王通.文中子[M].四部丛刊本.上海:上海书店出版社,1989.
  • 6萧统.六臣注文选[M].北京:中华书局,1987.
  • 7王运熙.孔稚硅的《北山移文》[N].文汇报,1961-07-29.
  • 8萧统.文选[M].上海:上海古籍出版社标点本,1986..
  • 9许梿.六朝文絮笺注[M].黎经诰,笺注.北京:中华书局,1962.
  • 10于光华.重订文选集评[M].刻本.锡山:启秀堂,1778(清乾隆四十三年).

共引文献931

同被引文献31

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部