期刊文献+

正电子发射断层显像-计算机断层显像在鼻咽癌远处转移诊断中的应用价值 被引量:3

The role of PET-CT in diagnosing distant metastasis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨正电子发射断层显像-计算机断层显像(PET—CT)在鼻咽癌远处转移诊断和M分期中的价值。方法257例初治鼻咽癌患者于治疗前行胸部X线摄片、腹部B型超声检查、骨发射单光子计算机断层扫描(ECT)等常规检查和PET—CT扫描。依据病理活检和随访结果比较PET—CT和常规检查在远处转移诊断和M分期中的作用。结果39例(15.2%)鼻咽癌存在远处转移,其中PET-CT检出34例,而常规检查仅检出22例。PET—CT假阳性率为12.8%(5/39)。若按转移灶分布部位分析,PET-CT能提高纵隔转移检出率(X^2=4.063,P=0.041)和骨转移的检出率(X^2=5.939,P=0.015)。与常规检查相比,PET-CT改变了19例(7.4%)患者的M分期,判断正确14例,判断错误5例。结论PET-CT判断鼻咽癌远处转移和M分期较常规检查准确。 Objective To explore the clinical significance of PET-CT in evaluating distant metastasis and M staging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma(NPC). Methods 257 NPC patients with no prior treatment were investigated with PET-CT and conventional imaging (chest X-ray, abdominal ultrasound, and bone scan). The findings of PET-CT in diagnosing distant metastasis and M staging were compared with those of conventional imaging aeeordirig to the results of biopsy and follow-up. Results PET-CT disclosed 34 of 39 patients with distant malignancy compared with 22 patients disclosed by conventional imaging. The false positive rate of PET-CT was 12.8 %. On region-based analyses, PET-CT was more effective than bone scan and chest X-ray for detecting mediastinum metastasis (X2=4.063, P =0.041) and bone metastasis (X2=5.939, P=0.015), respectively. Compared with conventional imaging, PET-CT had an impact on the M staging of 19 patients (7.4 %), of which 15 patients were truly staged and 4 patients incorrectly staged. Conclusion PET-CT is superior to MRI in evaluating distant metastasis and M staging of NPC.
出处 《肿瘤研究与临床》 CAS 2011年第5期294-298,共5页 Cancer Research and Clinic
关键词 鼻咽肿瘤 诊断 体层摄影术 发射型计算机 肿瘤转移 肿瘤分期 Nasopharyngeal neoplasms Diagnosis Tomography, emission-computed Neoplasm metastasis Neoplasm staging
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Teo PM, Kwan WH, Lee WY, et al. Prognosticators determining survival subsequent to distant metastasis from nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer, 1996, 77: 2423-231.
  • 2Vokes EE, Liebowitz DN, Weichselbaum RR. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Lancet, 1997, 350: 1087-1091.
  • 3Liu FY, Chang JT, Wang HM, et al. [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography is more sensitive than skeletal scintigraphy for detecting bone metastasis in endemic nasopharyngeal carcinoma at initial staging. J Clin Oncol, 2006, 24: 599-604.
  • 4Liu FY, Lin CY, Chang JT, et al. ^18F-FDG PET can replace conventional work-up in primary M staging of nonkeratinizing nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Nucl Med, 2007, 48: 1614-1619.
  • 5Ng SH, Chan SC, Yen TC, et al. Staging of untreated nasopharyngeal carcinoma with PET/CT: comparison with conventional imaging work- up. EurJ Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2009, 36: 12-22.
  • 6Chua ML, Ong SC, Wee JT, et al. Comparison of 4 modalities for distant metastasis staging in endemic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Head Neck, 2009, 31: 346-354.
  • 7Paulson EK. Evaluation of the liver for metastatic disease. Semin Liver Dis, 2001, 21: 225-236.
  • 8Barentsz J, Takahashi S, Oyen W, et al. Commonly used imaging techniques for diagnosis and staging. J Clin Oncol, 2006, 24: 3234- 3244.
  • 9Algra PR, Bloem JL, Tissing H, et al. Detection of vertebral metastases: comparison between MR imaging and bone scintigraphy. Radiographics, 1991, 11: 219-232.
  • 10潘建基.鼻咽癌’92分期修订工作报告[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2009,18(1):2-6. 被引量:261

二级参考文献25

共引文献260

同被引文献12

  • 1胡伟汉,张国义,刘立志,吴湖炳,李立,高远红,潘燚,王全师.PET-CT与MRI诊断鼻咽癌淋巴结转移的对比研究[J].癌症,2005,24(7):855-860. 被引量:33
  • 2张国义,胡伟汉,刘立志,吴湖炳,高远红,李立,潘燚,王全师.PET/CT与MRI在鼻咽癌淋巴结转移诊断和N分期中的比较研究[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2006,28(5):381-384. 被引量:19
  • 3Lee AW, Ng WT, Chan YH, et al. The battle against na- sopharyngeal cancer[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2012,104 (3) :272- 278.
  • 4Abdel K,King A. MRI and CT of nasopharyngeal carcino- ma [J]. Am J Roentgenol,2012,198( 1 ) : 11-18.
  • 5Sharma P, Singhal A, Kumar A,et al. Evaluation of thymic tumors with 18F-FDG PET-CT: a pictorial review[J]. Acta Radiol, 2013,54(1 ) : 14-21.
  • 6Vorre MM, Abdulla J. Diagnostic accuracy and radiation dose of CT coronary angiography in atrial fibrillation: sys tematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Radiology,2013,267 (2) :376-386.
  • 7Liu T, Xu W, Yan WL,et al. FDG-PET, CT, MRI for diagnosis of local residual or recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma, which one is the best?-A systematic review [J]. Radiother Oncol, 2007, 85 (3) : 327-335.
  • 8Lee AW, Lin JC, Ng WT. Current management of na- sopharyngeal cancer [J]. Semin Radiat Oncol, 2012,22 (3) : 233-244.
  • 9Yu E, O'Sullivan B, Kim J,et al. Magnetic resonance i- ma ging of nasopharyngeal earcinoma [J]. Expert Rev Ant icancer Yher, 2010,10(3) :365-375.
  • 10孙新儒,胡莹莹,张旭,林晓平,梁培炎,樊卫,陈明远,赵充.^(18)F-FDG PET/CT SUV在鼻咽癌T分期中的价值[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2010,31(4):535-539. 被引量:7

引证文献3

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部