期刊文献+

制度变迁、投资者保护与会计稳健性 被引量:5

Evolution of Institution,Legal Protection of Investors and Accounting Conservatism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章试图揭示伴随资本市场制度变迁以及投资者保护力度的加大,一种重要的会计信息质量特征———会计稳健性历史演变的内在逻辑。研究发现,在2007年之前,随着我国资本市场制度变迁及投资者法律保护力度的加大,我国上市公司会计稳健性相应呈现出阶段递增的特征;但是随着新的企业会计准则在上市公司施行,自2007年开始会计稳健性不再显著,公允价值应用范围的扩大可能对会计稳健性起到了消极作用。因此,提出的政策建议是,在修订会计准则内容,提高会计信息相关性的同时,会计信息的其他质量特征也是需要关注的问题;提高会计信息质量不但有赖于会计制度改革,法律、公司治理等基础制度设施的建设也是不可缺少的。 This paper attempts to reveal the inherent logic of conservatism historical evolution,which is an important characteristic of accounting information quality with the capital market system evolution and the increasing of investor protection.This paper shows that: before 2007,with the changes in China's capital market system and the increasing of investors protection,accounting conservatism in China's listed companies shows the corresponding progressive features.But with the new accounting standards implemented in listed companies,accounting conservatism is no longer significant since 2007,and the expansion of the scope of application of fair value accounting may have played a negative role on conservatism.The policy recommendations are put forward: when the revision of accounting standards aims to improve accounting information relevance,the other qualitative characteristics of accounting information need to be paid attention.Improving the quality of accounting information not only relies on accounting system reform,but also relies on the building of law,corporate governance and other infrastructure system facilities.
作者 董红星
出处 《华东经济管理》 CSSCI 2011年第8期110-114,135,共6页 East China Economic Management
基金 航空科学基金(2008ZG55012)
关键词 投资者保护 会计稳健性 公司治理 会计信息质量特征 investor protection accounting conservatism corporation governance characteristics of accounting information quality
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Basu S. The Conservatism Principle and the Asymmetric Timeliness of Earnings [ J ]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1997, (24) : 3 -37.
  • 2Watts R L. Conservatism in accounting Part I: Explanations and implications [J]. Accounting Horizons, 2003, (17) : 207 - 221.
  • 3La Porta, Lopez-de- Silanes, Shleifer, et al. Law and Finance [J]. The Journal of Political Economy, 1998, (106): 1113-1155.
  • 4La Porta, Lopez - de Silanes, Shleifer, et al. Legal Determinants of External Finance [ J ]. Journal of Finance, 1997, (52): 1131-1150.
  • 5Givoly D, Hayn C. The changing time - series properties of earnings, cash flows and accruals: Has financial reporting become more conservative? [J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2000, (29) : 287-320.
  • 6Holthausen R W, Watts R L. The relevance of value - relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting [J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2001, (31) : 3 -75.
  • 7Pope P F, Walker M. International differences in the timeliness, conservatism, and the classification of earnings [ J ]. Journal of Accounting Research, 1999, (37) : 53 - 87.
  • 8Ball R, Kothari S P, Robin A. The Effect of International Institutional Factors on Properties of Accounting Earnings [ J]. Journal ofAccounting & Economics, 2000, 29 ( 1 ) : 1 -51.
  • 9Bushman R, Piotroski J. Financial Reporting Incentives for Conservative Accounting: The Influence of Legal and Political Institutions [ R]. NBER working paper, University of North Carolina, Stanford University; University of Chicago, 2005.
  • 10曲晓辉,邱月华.强制性制度变迁与盈余稳健性——来自深沪证券市场的经验证据[J].会计研究,2007(7):20-28. 被引量:134

二级参考文献110

共引文献471

同被引文献69

引证文献5

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部