期刊文献+

老龄橡胶树不同器官含碳率分析 被引量:3

Analysis on the Carbon Content of Different Organs of Rubber tree(Hevea brasiliensis) in Regeneration Priod
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用收获法测定与分析30 a老龄橡胶树不同器官含碳率。结果表明:(1)橡胶林地上部分各器官含碳率依次为:树叶(52.90%)>树干(48.84%)>侧枝(47.46%)>树皮(46.20%)>嫩枝(45.20%),其中树叶含碳率显著高于其它器官;橡胶林地面部分凋落物各组分的含碳率大小为,落果(55.30%)>落叶(53.22%)>落花(51.25%)>枯枝(47.81%),且各组分含碳率两两之间差异显著,橡胶树相同组分枯样的含碳率大于鲜样;(2)橡胶林地下部分不同直径根系含碳率依次为:大根(49.40%)>细根(49.16%)>粗根(49.08%)>根桩(48.65%)>小根(47.37%)>中根(46.94%);(3)橡胶树主要器官占单株的总含碳率分别为:树叶占21.79%、树干占20.12%、树根19.96%、树枝占19.09%、树皮占19.13%。更新期橡胶树单株的平均含碳率为48.55%。 By means of the harvesting method, we studied the carbon content in different organs of rubber trees (Hevea brasiliensis) in regeneration period. The results showed that the carbon content of aboveground organs of rubber trees decreased in the order: leaves (52.90%) 〉trunks (48.84%) 〉collaterals (47.46%) 〉barks (46.20%) 〉twigs (45.20%). The carbon content of leaves was significantly higher than those of other organs. The carbon content of different components of litter in rubber plantation decreased as the following order: fruits (55.30%)〉deciduous (53.22%〉flowers(51.25%)〉deadwoods(47.81%), and with significant differences between any two components. The content of the withering sample of same kind of component was greater than that of fresh litter. The carbon content of roots with different diameters of rubber trees decreased as the order: large roots(49.40%)〉fine roots (49.16%)〉coarse roots(49.08%)〉stump-roots(48.65%)〉small roots(47.37%)〉medium roots(46.94%). The total carbon rates of main organs accounting for whole rubber trees were leaves 21.79%, trunks 20.12%, roots 9.96%, branches 19.09% and barks 19.13%, respectively. The average carbon content of the rubber tree in regeneration was 48.55%.
出处 《热带作物学报》 CSCD 2011年第4期587-591,共5页 Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops
基金 中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金橡胶研究所资助项目(No.XJSYWFZX2008-18 No.XJSYWFZX2009-30)
关键词 橡胶树 器官 含碳率 Hevea brasiliensis: Organ eomoonent Carbon content
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1王效科,冯宗炜.森林生态系统中生物量和碳贮量的研究历史[M].北京:中国科学与技术出版社.1995.335-347.
  • 2王效科,冯宗炜.中国森林生态系统中植物固定大气碳的潜力[J].生态学杂志,2000,19(4):72-74. 被引量:218
  • 3Elias M, Potvin C. Assessing inter-and intra-specific variation in trunk carbon concentration for 32 neotropical tree species[J]. Can J Forest Res, 2003, 33: 1039-1045.
  • 4Fukatsu E, Fukuda Y, Takahashi M, et al. Clonal variation of carbon content in wood of Larix kaempferi (Japanese larch)[J]. Journal of Wood Science, 2008, 54: 247-251.
  • 5Thomas S C, Malczewski G, Saprunoff M. Assessing the potential of native tree species for carbon sequestration forestry in Northeast China[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2007, 85(3): 663-671.
  • 6魏文俊,王兵,白秀兰.杉木人工林碳密度特征与分配规律研究[J].江西农业大学学报,2008,30(1):73-80. 被引量:26
  • 7何斌,刘运华,余浩光,秦武明,韦善华,蔡树威.南宁马占相思人工林生态系统碳素密度与贮量[J].林业科学,2009,45(2):6-11. 被引量:30
  • 8莫江明,方运霆,彭少麟,Brown Sandra,周国逸.鼎湖山南亚热带常绿阔叶林碳素积累和分配特征[J].生态学报,2003,23(10):1970-1976. 被引量:35
  • 9Zhang H, Zhang G L, Zhao Y G, et ol. Chemical degradation of a Ferralsol(Oxisol)under intensive rubber(Hevea brasiliensis) farming in tropical China[J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 2007, 93: 109-116..
  • 10森林土壤有机质的测定及碳氮比的计算[S].中华人民共和国林业行业标准.LY/T1237-1999.

二级参考文献124

共引文献569

同被引文献75

引证文献3

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部