期刊文献+

几种检测猪弓形虫病ELISA诊断试剂盒的对比 被引量:10

Comparison of Five ELISA Kits for Detection of Anti-Toxoplasma gondii Antibodies in Experimentally Infected Swine
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以人工感染弓形虫的猪阳性血清及感染前的阴性血清为样品,比较3个国产(A、B、C)和2个国外(D、E)ELISA试剂盒检测猪弓形虫病的敏感性。用这5种ELISA试剂盒,检测人工感染弓形虫的猪阳性血清42份及感染前的阴性血清45份,并参考PCR扩增结果,比较这5种ELISA试剂盒检测猪弓形虫病的敏感性。5种试剂盒中,1种国产试剂盒的检测结果与PCR结果完全一致,其余4种试剂盒的检测结果都与PCR检测结果差别较大。结果表明,国产试剂盒A的检测效果最佳,国外试剂盒与部分国内试剂盒的检测结果相当,临床选用试剂盒时,可选择检测效果最佳的试剂盒A,不必盲目选择国外试剂盒。 The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the sensitivities of five ELISA kits for detection of Toxoplasma gondii infection in experimentally infected pigs.The PCR-positive serum samples from experimentally infected pigs were examined by the five ELISA kits.The results of different ELISA kits were compared among them and with that of PCR amplification to evaluate and compare their sensitivities.One ELISA kit(ELISA-A) made in China showed 100% detection of T.gondii antibody in experimentally infected pigs,showing 100% sensitivity.Whereas,the other ELISA kits displayed different low sensitivities.These results indicated that the ELISA-A kit is the most sensitive for detection of T.gondii infection in pigs.
出处 《中国畜牧兽医》 CAS 北大核心 2011年第6期218-221,共4页 China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(30901067) 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(20094404120016) 广东省科技计划项目(2009B020307011) 广东省自然科学基金(10451064201005443) 广东省高等学校自然科学基金(9451064201003715) 畜疫病病原生物学国家重点实验室(SKLVEB2009KFKT014 SKLVEB2010KFKT010) 教育部"长江学者和创新团队发展计划"创新团队项目(IRT0723)资助
关键词 弓形虫 猪弓形虫病 人工感染 ELISA 对比 Toxoplasma gondii swine toxoplasmosis experimental infection ELISA comparison
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1任庆娥,周春香,菅复春,冯超,张龙现.弓形虫病分子诊断技术研究进展[J].中国畜牧兽医,2009,36(5):66-71. 被引量:5
  • 2何艳燕,蒋守富,马杏宝,邱倩雯.国内外16种弓形虫诊断试剂盒的评估[J].旅行医学科学,2008,14(3):43-45. 被引量:11
  • 3蒋守富,张述义,潘彩娥,何艳燕,魏梅雄.5种市售弓形虫抗体检测试剂盒的评价[J].中国人兽共患病杂志,2003,19(1):97-99. 被引量:28
  • 4于恩庶.对国内市售弓形虫病诊断试剂盒的评价和建议[J].中国人兽共患病杂志,2001,17(3):5-6. 被引量:37
  • 5Murrell K D,AndersonW R,Schad G A,et al.Field evaluation ofthe ELISA test for swine trichinosis:efficacy of the excretory-se-cretory antigen. American Journal of Veterinary Research . 1985
  • 6Singh S,Singh N,Dwived S N.Evaluation of seven commerciallyavailable ELISA kits for serodiagnosis of acute toxoplasmosis. The Indian Journal of Medical Research . 1997
  • 7Homan WL,Vercammen M,De Braekeleer J,et al.Identification of a 200- to 300-fold repetitive 529?bp DNA fragment in Toxoplasma gondii, and its use for diagnostic and quantitative PCR. International Journal for Parasitology . 2000
  • 8Dubey JP,Hill DE,Jones JLet al.Prevalence of viableToxo-plasma gondiiin beef,chicken,and pork from retail meatstores in the United States:risk assessment to consumers〔J〕. Journal of Parasitology . 2005
  • 9H.R. Gamble J.P. Dubey and D.N. Lambillotte.Comparison of a commercial ELISA with the modified agglutination test for detection of Toxoplasma infection in the domestic pig. Veterinary Parasitology . 2005
  • 10Dolores E. Hill Sreekumar Chirukandoth J.P. Dubey Joan K. Lunney and H. Ray Gamble.Comparison of detection methods for Toxoplasma gondii in naturally and experimentally infected swine. Veterinary Parasitology . 2006

二级参考文献55

共引文献59

同被引文献104

引证文献10

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部