期刊文献+

低危初产妇正常分娩会阴侧切的病例对照研究 被引量:74

Case-control Study of Lateral Episiotomy in Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery of Low-Risk Primiparas
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较在低危初产妇正常分娩中,会阴侧切者与未侧切者之间母儿结局,以更加合理地应用该手术。方法回顾性病例资料对照分析。在某院选取某一时期头位、单胎、正常分娩的低危初产妇,并由中级助产师接产,组成样本。记录母儿结局。分析应用会阴侧切组与未侧切组之间母儿结局,并比较不同接产人员间会阴侧切率与母儿结局。结果会阴侧切组与不侧切组初产妇年龄、孕周、新生儿体质量一般情况比较差异无统计学意义,组间具有可比性;两组在产程时间、新生儿评分方面比较差异均无统计学意义,会阴侧切组有更多的产后出血,差异有统计学意义(t=3.431,P=0.001)。会阴侧切组与未侧切组新生儿1 min窒息发生率和5 min窒息发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.886、P=0.261)。6名助产士接产的产妇会阴侧切率差异很大,分别为33.0%、83.3%、87.8%、90.6%、90.7%、94.2%,差异有统计学意义(P=0.000),但6组新生儿窒息发生率比较差异无统计学意义。结论会阴侧切与不侧切之间,母儿结局比较差异无统计学意义,不支持会阴侧切能够缩短产程和预防胎儿窒息。在低危初产妇正常分娩中,会阴侧切的应用在不同的助产士之间差异巨大,提示助产士是影响会阴侧切应用的重要因素。鉴于会阴侧切潜在的危害,应加强指征控制,加强会阴保护与会阴侧切规范化操作培训,提高助产士自身实践水平与判断能力。对于低危初产妇正常分娩不应常规进行会阴侧切。 Objective To compare different maternal and neonatal outcomes of low risk primiparas with and without episiotomy in spontaneous vaginal delivery.Methods 400 cases of low-risk primiparas with head position,singleton and normal laboring were divided into episiotomy group and non-episiotomy group with case-control study.Maternal and neonatal outcomes were observed.Rate of episiotomy among different midwives also analyzed.Results There was no statistical difference of age,pregnant week,labor process,Apgar score and neonatal birth weight in two groups.The rates of asphyxia at 1 minute(P=0.886) and at 5 minute(P=0.261) were of no statistical difference between two groups.There were more patients with postpartum bleeding in episiotomy group(t=3.431,P=0.001).Rates of episiotomy from 6 midwives varied from33.0%,83.3%,87.8%,90.6%,90.7%,94.2% respectively(P=0.000).There was no statistical difference of the comparison of asphyxia incidences.Conclusion Maternal and neonatal outcomes are of no statistical difference between primiparous women with episiotomy and those without,but there is more postpartum bleeding in women with episiotomy.The episiotomy incidence varies greatly among different midwives.More training on episiotomy should be provided for midwives and routine use of episiotomy in low-risk women with normal birth is not advocated.
出处 《护理学报》 2011年第9期10-12,共3页 Journal of Nursing(China)
关键词 初产妇 正常分娩 会阴侧切 母儿结局 primipara spontaneous vaginal delivery lateral episiotomy maternal and neonatal outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Woolley R J.Benefits and Risks of Episiotomy:A Review of the English-language Literature Since 1980.Part I[J].Obstet Gynecol Surv,1995,50(11):806-820.
  • 2Zlatnik F J.Normal Labor and Delivery[M].In:Scott JR,Disaia PJ,Hammond CB,Spellacy WN,eds.Danforth's obstetrics and gynecology,7th ed.Philadelphia:JB Lippincott,1994:105-128.
  • 3张善之 译.关于分娩时会阴切开的问题.国外医学:妇产科学分册,1984,11(5):315-315.
  • 4Thacker S B,Banta H D.Benefits and Risks of Episiotomy:an Interpretive Review of the English Language Literature,1860-1980[J].Obstet Gynecol Surv,1983,38(6):322-338.
  • 5Is There a Benefit to Episiotomy at Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery? A Natural Experiment.Transactions of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the Society of Perinatal Obstetricians[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,1996,175(4):897-901.
  • 6Harrison R F,Brennan M,North P M,et al.Is Routine Episiotomy Necessary?[J].BMJ,1984,288(6435):1971-1975.
  • 7徐晓阳,姚珍薇.妇女产后性问题与分娩方式[J].实用妇产科杂志,2002,18(3):146-148. 被引量:96
  • 8Sleep J,Grant A,Garcia J,et al.West Berkshire Perineal Management Trial[J].BMJ,1984,289(6445):587-590.
  • 9Robinson J N,Norwitz E R,Cohen A P,et al.Predictors of Episiotomy Use at First Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery[J].2000,96(2):214-218.
  • 10Dannecker C,Hillemanns P,Strauss A,et al.Episiotomy and Perineal Tears Presumed to Be Imminent:Randomized Controlled Trial[J].Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand,2004,83(4):364-368.

二级参考文献2

  • 1严仁英 曹泽毅 等.妇女生殖健康与妇女保健.中华妇产科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1999.954.
  • 2刘庸 曹泽毅.产褥期生理变化.中华妇产科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1999.286-287.

共引文献95

同被引文献453

引证文献74

二级引证文献730

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部