期刊文献+

基于剪切型结构的速度脉冲地震地面运动强度表征参数评估 被引量:1

EVALUATION OF INTENSITY MEASURES FOR VELOCITY PULSE-LIKE EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONS BASED ON SHEAR TYPE MDOF SYSTEMS
原文传递
导出
摘要 研究速度脉冲型地震地面运动强度表征参数(IM)与剪切型多自由度(MDOF)体系顶层非线性变形需求的相关性,并分析IM的有效性。采用20条速度大脉冲型地震动记录,基于MDOF体系的非线性动力时程分析,研究恒延性水平(μ)条件下速度脉冲地震动IM与MDOF体系最大非线性顶层位移相关性系数的变化规律;通过线性回归和离差分析,分析速度脉冲地震地面运动强度参数的有效性。分析结果表明:结构基本周期与延性水平对相关性和离散性均有较大影响;峰值地面运动速度(PGV)作为IM,相关性系数较大且离差较小,相关性和离差表现较稳定,是较好的速度脉冲地震动IM。 The correlation between intensity measures(IM) for velocity pulse-like earthquake ground motions and nonlinear deformation demand of shear type multi-degree-freedom(MDOF) systems is researched,and the efficiency of IM is described.Based on the nonlinear dynamic time analysis of MDOF systems subjected to 20 large velocity pulse-like ground motions,this work investigates the variation trend of the correlation coefficient between IM for pulse-like ground motions and maximum nonlinear roof drift demand of MDOF systems with the constant-ductility system setting.Linear regression and dispersion analyses are performed on these results to identify the efficiency of IM for pulse-like ground motions.The study shows that the fundamental period and ductility level of a structure have important influence on the correlation and dispersion.When PGV is used as IM for pulse-like ground motions,the correlation and dispersion is relatively stable with the large relative coefficient and the small dispersion.
出处 《工程力学》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2011年第6期149-155,175,共8页 Engineering Mechanics
基金 教育部博士点基金项目(20094301120001) 亚热带建筑科学国家重点实验室基金项目(2010KB13)
关键词 地面运动强度表征参数 速度脉冲 多自由度体系 相关性 有效性 ground motion intensity measures pulse-like multi degree freedom system correlation efficiency
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Travasarou T, Bray J D. Optimal ground motion intensity measures for assessment of seismic Slope displacements [C]. Proceeding of the 7th Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Christchurch, Paper No.093, 2003.
  • 2郝敏,谢礼立,李伟.基于砌体结构破坏损伤的地震烈度物理标准研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2007,27(5):27-32. 被引量:13
  • 3Akkar S, Ozen o. Effect of peak ground velocity on deformation demands for SDOF systems [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2005, 34(13): 1551-1571.
  • 4Riddell R, Garcia E J. Hysteretic energy spectrum and damage control [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2001, 30(12): 1791- 1816.
  • 5叶列平,马千里,缪志伟.结构抗震分析用地震动强度指标的研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2009,29(4):9-22. 被引量:124
  • 6Bertero V V, Mahin S A, Herrera R A. Seismic design implication of near-fault San Fernando earthquake records [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1978, 6(1): 31-42.
  • 7Luco N, Cornell CA. Structure-specific scalar intensity measures for near-source and ordinary earthquake ground motions [J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2007, 23(2): 357-392.
  • 8Baker J W, Comell C A. Vector-valued intensity measures for pulse-like near-fault ground motions [J]. Engineering Structures, 2008, 30(4): 1048-1057.
  • 9Alavi B. Behavior of moment-resisting frame structures subjected to near-fault ground motions [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2004, 33(6): 687- 706.
  • 10Makris N, Black C J. Evaluation of peak ground velocity as a 'Good' intensity Measure for near-source ground motions [J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2004, 130(9): 1032- 1044.

二级参考文献22

共引文献133

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部