期刊文献+

弹性机翼阵风响应和载荷减缓与风洞试验验证 被引量:12

GUST RESPONSE,LOAD ALLEVIATION AND WIND-TUNNEL EXPERIMENT VERIFICATION OF ELASTIC WING
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对弹性机翼风洞模型,采用经典控制理论设计能够同时减缓翼尖加速度(WTA)和翼根弯矩(WRBM)的阵风减缓控制律。试验在航天空气动力技术研究院FD-09低速风洞进行。风洞试验段尺寸为3m×3m。理论和试验结果均表明,当来流速度为14m/s时,针对频率为2Hz―3Hz的阵风,阵风减缓控制律可使WTA和WRBM分别减小25%―35%和30%―40%。当来流速度为10m/s―16m/s时,针对频率为2Hz的阵风,阵风减缓控制律使WTA和WRBM分别减小27%―34%和30%―40%。本算例中控制律在低频段对WTA的减缓效果直接影响该控制律对WRBM的减缓效果。结构有限元模型与真实模型存在工程允许的误差使得理论与试验结果存在一定的误差。相关工作对工程实际中采用阵风减缓技术具有参考价值。 Based on a wind-tunnel model of an elastic wing,the gust response and the load alleviation control law design using classical control theory are presented.The test is performed in the FD-09 low-speed wind tunnel with the size of 3m×3m,which is located at China Academy of Aerospace Aerodynamics.Numerical analysis and test results show that(1) the wing tip acceleration(WTA) is alleviated by 25%―35% and the wing-root bending moment(WRBM) is alleviated by 30%―40% when the air speed is 14m/s and the gust frequency ranges from 2 to 3Hz;(2) the WTA in closed-loop is alleviated by 27%―34% and the WRBM in closed-loop is alleviated by 30%―40% when the air speed ranges from 10 to 16m/s and the gust frequency is 2Hz.In this study,the alleviation effect of WTA on the low frequency has direct influence on the alleviation effect of WRBM.The error between the finite element model and the reality model causes the error between the theoretical result and test result.
出处 《工程力学》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2011年第6期212-218,共7页 Engineering Mechanics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(90716006 10902006)
关键词 气动弹性 气动伺服弹性 阵风响应减缓 阵风载荷减缓 风洞试验 aeroelastic aeroservoelastic gust response alleviation gust load alleviation wind-tunnel experiment
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1金长江,肖业伦.大气扰动中的飞行原理[M].北京:国防工业出版社.1992:57.
  • 2McKENZIE J R. B-52 control configured vehicles ride control analysis and flight test [C]. AIAA 73-782, 1973.
  • 3Disney T E. C-5A active load alleviation system [J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 1977, 14(2): 81 - 86.
  • 4Winther B A, Shirley W A, Heimbaugh R M. Wind-tunnel investigation of active control technology applied to a DC-10 deribative [C]. AIAA 80-0771, 1980.
  • 5Britt R T, Jacobson S B. Aeroservoelastic analysis of the B-2 Bomber [J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2000, 37(5): 745- 752.
  • 6Abdelmoula F. Design of an open-loop gust alleviation control system for airborne gravimetry [J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 1999(6): 379-389.
  • 7Matsuzaki Y, Ueda T, Miyazawa Y. Gust load alleviation of transport-type wing: test and analysis [J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1989, 26(4): 322-327.
  • 8Moulin B, Karpel M. Gust toad alleviation using special control surfaces [J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2007, 44(1):17-24.
  • 9Scott R C, Travis K. Aeroservoelastic testing of a sidewall mounted freeflying wind-tunnel model [C]. AIAA 2008-7186, 2008.
  • 10吴志刚,杨超.主动气动弹性机翼的颤振主动抑制与阵风减缓研究[J].机械强度,2003,25(1):32-35. 被引量:21

二级参考文献8

  • 1谭智勇,安锦文.H_∞控制理论在阵风缓和控制中的应用[J].火力与指挥控制,2005,30(3):93-95. 被引量:6
  • 2[1]Perry B Ⅲ, Cole S R, Miller G D. Summary of an active flexible wing program. Journal of Aircraft, 1995, 32(1): 10~ 15.
  • 3[5]Tiffang S H, Karpel M. Aeroservoelastic modeling and applications using minimum-state approximations of the unsteady aerodynamics. AIAA-89-1188-CP, 1989.
  • 4[6]XIONG Gang. Synthesis of flutter suppression control law for active aeroelastic wing, AIAA-2001-1463, 2001.
  • 5[7]Mukhopadhyay Ⅴ, Newson J R. A Multi-loop system stability margin study using matrix singular values. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics,1984, 7(5): 582 ~ 587.
  • 6鲁道夫·布罗克豪斯.飞行控制[M].北京:国防工业出版社,1999.221-223.
  • 7Gangsaas D Ly U,Norman D C.Practical Gust Load Alleviation and Flutter Suppression Control Laws Based on a LQG Methodology[R].Washington:Boeing Commercial Airplane Company,1981.
  • 8梁苏南,王立新,张曙光.飞机风载减缓控制技术及其发展[J].飞行力学,2003,21(1):1-4. 被引量:8

共引文献41

同被引文献69

引证文献12

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部