期刊文献+

腹泻新病原艰难梭菌DNA提取方法的比较研究 被引量:1

A comparison of four methods for extraction of Clostridium difficile DNA
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:比较提取高质量艰难梭菌基因组总DNA的方法。方法:采用4种不同方法提取艰难梭菌基因组DNA,比较作为模板用于扩增艰难梭菌看家基因磷酸丙糖异构酶(tpi)基因的优缺点。结果:除沸水浴法,其他3种方法制备的艰难梭菌DNA均能成功用作PCR扩增的模板。CTAB/NaCl法进行提取可有效去除多糖成分,但操作要求较高。碱裂解法操作简便、省时、成本低经济可靠,提取的DNA量及纯度较合适;试剂盒抽提出的产物纯度和产量明显高于CTAB/NACL、碱裂解法(P<0.05),但成本高。结论:四种方法各具优缺点,应根据实验室条件和实验要求进行选择。 Objective: To compare the relative efficiency and quality of extraction of C.difficile DNA using four different methods. Methods: Extract C.difficile genomic DNA with four different methods: immersion method, CTAB degrading solution, Alkali solit method and kit. To amplified the special gene (tpi) of C. difficile by real-time PCR. Results: The products by the three methods are suitable for real-time PCR amplification, but except immersion method. Extraction with CTAB degrading solution could remove the polysaccharide, but the method demands more operating skill. Alkali solit method offered a higher OD260/280 (1.80+0.06) and this method is simpler and cheaper. The purity and output of DNA extracted by kit were obviously higher (P〈0.05) ,but the method was more amplicated and expensive. Conclusion: The four methods all have advantages and disadvantages of their own, and which method to use should be based on the lab conditions and research demands.
出处 《旅行医学科学》 2011年第1期1-3,7,共4页
基金 江苏检验检疫局科研项目(2010KJ17)
关键词 艰难梭菌 TPI DNA提取 Clostridium difficile tpi DNA extraction
  • 相关文献

同被引文献14

  • 1梁光军,赵李祥,杨旭芹,贾红,张小荣,文其乙,刘秀梵.应用多重PCR方法鉴定粪样和食品中分离的产气荚膜梭菌[J].中国人兽共患病杂志,2005,21(5):420-423. 被引量:14
  • 2Halsey J. Current and future treatment modalities for Clostridium difficile-associated disease [J]. Am J Health Syst Pharm, 2008,65(8):705-715.
  • 3Balassiano I T, Miranda K R, Boente R F, et al. Characterization of Clostridium difficile strains isolated from immunosuppressed inpatients in a hospital in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil [J]. Anaerobe, 2009,15(3):61-64.
  • 4Cartman S T, Heap J T, Kuehne S A, et al. The emergence of 'hypervirulence' in Clostridium diffcile [J]. Int J Med Microbiol, 2010,300(6):387-395.
  • 5Arvand M, Hauri A M, Zalss N H, et al. Clostridium difficile ribotypes 001, 017, and 027 are associated with lethal C. difficile infection in Hesse, Germany [J]. Euro Surveill, 2009,14(45). pii: 19403.
  • 6Zilberberg M D, Tillotson G S, McDonald C. Clostridium difficile infections among hospitalized children, United States, 1997-2006 [J]. Emerg Infect Dis, 2010,16(4):604--609.
  • 7Lemee L, Dhalluin A, Testelin S, et al. Multiplex PCR targeting tpi (triose phosphate isomerase), tcdA (Toxin A), and tcdB (Toxin B) genes for toxigenic culture of Clostridium difficile [J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2004,42 (12): 5710-5714.
  • 8Samie A, Obi C L, Franasiak J, et al. PCR detection of Clostridium difficile triose phosphate isomerase (tpi), toxin A (tcdA), toxin B (tcdB), binary toxin (cdtA, cdtB), and tcdC genes in Vhembe District, South Africa [J]. Am J Trop Med Hyg, 2008,78(4):577-585.
  • 9胡云建.院内感染艰难梭菌相关性腹泻[J].中国医学科学院学报,2008,30(5):618-621. 被引量:8
  • 10陈云波,吴微珍,鲁海峰,杨介钻,王保红,孔海深,李兰娟.艰难梭菌相关性腹泻患者50例临床特征及其病原菌耐药性分析[J].浙江医学,2010,0(11):1632-1634. 被引量:7

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部