摘要
目的 观察胸段硬膜外阻滞对老年患者行胸科手术时全麻苏醒期躁动(emergence agitation,EA)的影响。方法 择期行胸科手术的老年患者40例,ASAⅡ-Ⅲ级。其中男23例,女17例,年龄65岁-78岁,均为食道癌和肺癌患者。将40例患者用完全随机法分为两组(每组20例),分别给予全麻复合硬膜外麻醉(A组)和全身麻醉(B组)。A组在全麻诱导前行硬膜外穿刺,间隙选择T5-6或T6-7之间,局麻药选用1.5%的利多卡因,确定硬膜外麻醉有效后再行全麻诱导。两组患者全麻诱导均采用静注依托咪酯0.2mg/kg-0.3mg/kg、芬太尼3μg/kg-4μg/kg、顺式阿曲库铵0.15mg/kg,诱导成功后插入双腔支气管导管,维持采用吸入l%-3%七氟烷,静脉泵注丙泊酚4mg·kg^-1.h^-1-6mg·kg^-1.h^-1、瑞芬太尼5μg·kg^-1.h^-1-10μg·kg^1.h^-1和顺式阿曲库铵0.1mg·kg^-1·h^-1-0.2mg·kg^-1.h^-1。A组每小时持续经硬外导管注入1.5%利多卡因5ml直至手术结束。B组单纯用全麻,全麻诱导和维持方案与A组相同,维持采用吸入1%-3%七氟烷,静脉泵注丙泊酚4mg·kg^-1.h^-1-6mg·kg^-1.h^-1瑞芬太尼10μg·kg^-1.h^-1-20μg·kg^-1·h^-1和顺式阿曲库铵0.1mg·kg^-1·h^-1-O.2mg·kg^-1·h^-1。两组患者术中出血均〈500ml,手术时间〈3h,维持输液以乳酸钠林格氏液和中分子羟乙基淀粉,保持两组患者的血流动力学平稳,并用肌松监测仪监测使两组患者都达到相同的肌松程度,手术结束前5min给予芬太尼2μg/kg,同时静脉接镇痛泵作术后镇痛,所有患者未使用催醒药。记录两组病例全麻药用量和拔管时间。患者拔管后送入重症加强护理病房(ICU),记录患者入ICU时的躁动评分(restlessness score,RS)。结果 A组和B组比较,RS评分(A组15分,B组32分)和EA例数(A组5例,B组12例)均明显低于B组(P=O.006,P〈O.01),其中危险性躁动(评分达3分)的患者A组有i例,而B组则达到了5例,两组差异有统计学意义(P=0.002,P〈O.01)。结论 硬膜外阻滞复合全麻可以显著降低老年胸科手术患者麻醉后EA特别是危险性躁动的发生率,有利患者的康复。
Objective To explore the effects of thoracic epidural block on emergence agitation (EA) in emergence period in elderly patients undergoing chest surgery. Methods Forty ASA II -Ⅲ patients (23 male, 17 female) aged 65 y-78 y undergoing esophageetomy or lobeetomy were randomized to receive either general combined thoracic epidural anesthesia (group A, n=20) and pure general anesthesia(group B, n=20). Thoracic 5-6 or 6-7(T5-6 or T6-7) vertebral clearance for puncture and epidural catheter was placed before general anesthesia in group A.A test dose of 4 ml 1.5% lidocaine was given. When correct positioning of the epidural catheter was confirmed,general anesthesia was induced with etomidate 0.2 mg/kg-0.3 mg/kg, fentanyl 3μg/kg-4 μg/kg and synatracurium O. 15 mg/kg. Anesthesia was maintained with inhalation 1%-3% sevoflurane, pumping propofol 4 mg. kg^-l.h^-1-6 mg.kg^-1.h^-1 and remifentanil 5 μg.kg. h^1-10μLg.kg^-1.h^-1 and syn-atracurium 0.1 mg.kg^-l.h^-1-0.2 mg. kg^-1.h^-1. 1.5% lidocaine was continuously infused at a rate of 5 ml/h during operation. In group B, the patients received the same general anesthesia technique as group A and without thoracic: epidural block. The blood loss of each patient was lower than 500 ml and the time of operation was within 3 hours. Hemodynamics were maintained stable and muscle relaxation was the same in both groups. Patients of both groups received 2 ug/kg fentanyl intravenously before end of operation and patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA). The restlessness score (RS), extubation time, general anesthesia dosage were recorded.
出处
《国际麻醉学与复苏杂志》
CAS
2011年第3期288-290,共3页
International Journal of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation