期刊文献+

个人拟合指标在艾森克人格测验中的应用 被引量:5

An Application of Person-fit Indices to EPQ
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:用个人拟合指标对EPQ量表数据进行分析,探讨不拟合现象的可能成因和不拟合被试对参数估计的影响。方法:用lz和Guttman错误检查不拟合情况,用RMSD、MD指标及ICC面积法考察参数估计结果的差异。结果:①lz<-1.65的被试占总人数的3.44%,lz与Guttman错误的相关为-0.838;②最不拟合的50人中,编号相连被试共有32人;③删去不拟合被试前后,特质参数差异很小,高区分度高难度和高区分度低难度项目参数差异大。结论:个人拟合指标可以找到团体测验中来自同一测试环境的异常反应被试集团;不拟合被试的存在,对被试特质参数的估计影响不大,但会造成对项目区分的低估,进而影响难度越大和越小的项目。 Objective: Person-fit indices were computed on EPQ.This study was to investigate the cause of misfit and the influence of the inclusion of misfitting persons in parameter estimates.Methods: lz and Guttman error were used to investigate the misfit.MD,RMSD indices and ICC method was used to evaluate the effect of deletion of mifitting persons.Results: ①lz-1.65 was found in 3.44% of the examinees,and lz was correlated-0.838 with Guttman error;②There were 32 in 50 most misfitting persons ranked in adjacent numbers;③It was found that person parameters changed little after deleting misfitting persons.However,the high α high β items and the high α low β items changed a lot.Conclusion: A group of aberrant response persons in the same testing environment were found out by person-fit indices in group test.The presence of misfitting person cannot influence person parameters much,but resulted in underestimating discrimination parameters,and then influenced the bias in estimation of higher or lower threshold parameters.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 2011年第3期323-326,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
关键词 项目反应理论 EPQ 个人拟合指标 ICC IRT EPQ Person-fit Index ICC
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1刘仁刚.条目反应理论简述[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2009,17(1):37-41. 被引量:4
  • 2Drasgow F, Levine M, Williams EA. Appropriateness measurement with polychotomous item response models and standardized indices. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistics Psychology, 1985, 38:67-86.
  • 3Nering ML, Meijer RR. A comparison of the person response function and the Iz person-fit statistic. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1998, 22:53-69.
  • 4Meijer RR, Sijtsma K. Methodology review:Evaluating per- son fit. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2001, 25(2): 107-135.
  • 5Meijer RR. The number of guttman errors as a simple and powerful person-fit statistic. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1994, 18:311-314.
  • 6Meijer RR, Egberink IJL, Emons WHM, et al. Detection and validation of unscalable item score patterns using item re- sponse theory: An illustration with harter's self-perception profile for children. Journal of Personality Assessment, 2008, 90(3): 227-238.
  • 7Reise SP, Due AM. The influence of test characteristics on the detection of aberrant response patterns. Applied Psy- chological Measurement, 1991, 15(3): 217-226.
  • 8Karabatsos G. Comparing the aberrant response detection performance of thirty-six person-fit statistics. Applied Measurement in Education, 2003, 16(4): 277-298.
  • 9Drasgow F, Levine MV, McLaughlin ME. Detecting inappropriate test scores with optimal and practical appropriate- ness indices. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1987, 11: 59-79.
  • 10Meijer RR. Diagnosing item score patterns on a test using item response theory-based person-fit statistics. Psychological Methods, 2003, 8(1): 72-87.

二级参考文献69

  • 1Lawley DN. On problems connected with item selection and test construction. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 1943, 61:273-287
  • 2Lazarsfeld PF. The logical and mathematical foundation of latent structure analysis. In Stouffer L, Guttman EA, Suchman PF, et al. Studies in social psychology in World War II, Vol. Ⅳ: Measurement and prediction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1950.362-412
  • 3Lord FM. A theory of testing scores. Psychometric Monograph, 1952
  • 4Lord FM. Some perspectives on the attenuation paradox in test theory. Psychological Bulletin, 1955, 52(6) : 505-510
  • 5Lord FM. A strong true-score theory, with applications. Psychometrika, 1965, 30(3) :239-270
  • 6Lord FM. A note on the normal ogive or logistic curve in item analysis. Psychometrika, 1965, 30(3) : 371-270
  • 7Lord FM. An empirical study of item-test regression. Psychometrika, 1965, 30(3) :373-376
  • 8Rasch G. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests.Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research, 1960
  • 9Davision ML, Chen TH. Parameter invariance in the rasch model. The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, 1991
  • 10Schumacker RE, Randall E. Rasch-hased factor analysis of dichotomously scored item response data. The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, 1991

共引文献14

同被引文献129

  • 1王利,李永鑫.招聘中的虚假反应及其识别[J].人力资源管理,2008(5):49-50. 被引量:1
  • 2郭庆科,周晶.Likert量表分析中不同IRT模型的有效性[J].心理学探新,2004,24(3):67-70. 被引量:36
  • 3曹亦薇.异常反应模式的识别和分类[J].心理学报,2001,33(6):558-563. 被引量:9
  • 4吴燕,徐建平.初中生诚实性测验中社会赞许反应研究[J].心理发展与教育,2007,23(3):107-111. 被引量:15
  • 5Meijer RR. Person fit research:An Introduction. Applied Measurement in Education, 1996, 9(1): 3-8.
  • 6Schmitt N, Cortina JM, Whitney DJ. Appropriateness fit and criterion-related validity. Applied Psychological Measure- ment, 1993, 17:143-150.
  • 7Schmitt N, Chan D, Sacco JM, et al. Correlates of person fit and effect of person fit on test validity. Applied Psycholog- ical Measurement, 1999, 23:41-53.
  • 8Meijer RR. Person fit and criterion-related validilty:An ex- tension of the schmitt, cortina, and whitney study. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1997, 21(2): 99-113.
  • 9Zickar MJ, Robie C. Modeling faking good on personality items: An item-level analysis. Journal of Applied Psychol- ogy, 1999, 84(4): 551-563.
  • 10Dodeen H. The use of person-fit statistics to analyze place- ment tests. Chicago, 2003.

引证文献5

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部