期刊文献+

丛枝菌根与植物寄生性线虫相互作用及抗性机制 被引量:4

Mechanisms of Plant Resistance to Plant-parasitic Nematodes Mediated by Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi
下载PDF
导出
摘要 丛枝菌根真菌(arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi,AMF)能够与大多数陆地植物互惠共生,促进植物对养分的吸收,提高植物对各种生物和非生物胁迫的抗逆性,对植物健康生长有重要的作用。在土壤中丛枝菌根真菌与植物寄生性线虫共同依靠寄主植物根系完成生命循环,但二者对寄主植物作用完全相反,引起研究者广泛兴趣,成为菌根研究的热点和焦点之一。本文分析了丛植菌根真菌与植物寄生线虫的相互作用,并探讨了菌根提高植物对线虫抗性的可能机制:菌根真菌改善植物的生长和营养状况、改变植物根系形态结构、影响根系分泌物和根际微生物区系、诱导寄主植物产生防御反应等,旨在深入挖掘丛枝菌根真菌的生物学功能,进一步发挥其在农业生产中的应用潜力。 Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) can form mutualistic symbioses with most of land plants. AMF can enhance nutrient uptake by plants and increase plant resistance to various adverse abiotic and biotic stresses. AMF and plant parasitized nematodes are all indigenous soil organisms and therefore co-exist in plant roots to finish their life cycle, but the potential role of AMF and nematode are totally reversed. The interaction between AMF and plant-parasitic nematodes have become one of the hot topics in AMF research. This paper focused on the direct and indirect roles of AMF in plant resistances to diseases. The following aspects were discussed: the direct competition between AMF and plant pathogens, the enhancement of plant growth and nutrient uptake, the changes of the root morphology and architecture, the alteration of root exudates and composition and distribution of soil microorganims in the rhizosphere, and the prime of plant defense reactions. It aims to deepen the understanding on the biological functionality of AMF and to explore its potential application in agriculture practices in future.
出处 《土壤》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第3期426-432,共7页 Soils
基金 北京市重点基金项目(6091001) 国家高科技发展项目(2006AA10Z423)资助
关键词 丛枝菌根 植物寄生性线虫 相互作用 生物防治机制 Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Plant-parasitic nematodes, Interaction, Bio-protection mechanisms
  • 相关文献

参考文献68

  • 1Chit-wood DJ. Research on plant-parasitic nematode biology conducted by the united states department of agriculture-agricultural research service. Pest Manage. Sci., 2003, 59: 748- 753.
  • 2Smith SE, Read DJ. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. 2nd Edition. London: Academic Press, 1997.
  • 3盖京苹,冯固,李晓林.丛枝菌根真菌的生物多样性研究进展[J].土壤,2005,37(3):236-242. 被引量:28
  • 4Olsson PA, Thingstrub I, Jakobsen I, Baath E. Estimation of the biomass of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a linseed field. Soil Biol. Biochem., 1999, 31:1879-1887.
  • 5李晓林,曹一平.VA菌根吸收矿质养分的机制[J].土壤,1993,25(5):274-277. 被引量:28
  • 6葛均青,于贤昌,王竹红.VAM对植物矿质营养的效应[J].土壤,2002,34(6):337-343. 被引量:13
  • 7Whipps JM. Prospects and limitations for mycorrhizas in biocontrol of root pathogens. Can. J. Bot., 2004, 82:1 198-1 227.
  • 8Harrier LA, Watson CA. The potential role of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi in the bioprotection of plants against soil-borne pathogens in organic and/or other sustainable forming systems. Pest Manag. Sci., 2004, 60:149-157.
  • 9Hol WHG, Cook R. An overview of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi-nematode interactions. Basic Appl. Ecol., 2005, 6:489-503.
  • 10Deliopoulos T, Haydock PPJ, Jones PW. Interaction between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and the nematicide aldicarb on hatch and development of the potato cyst nematode, Globodera pallida, and yield of potatoes. Nematology, 2008, 10:783-799.

二级参考文献85

  • 1张美庆,王幼珊,邢礼军,李慧荃,吴观以.VA真菌耐高磷营养菌株筛选[J].华北农学报,1995,10(3):76-79. 被引量:9
  • 2林先贵,郝文英.不同植物对VA菌根菌的依赖性[J].Acta Botanica Sinica,1989,31(9):721-725. 被引量:48
  • 3胡正嘉 王平.VA菌根真菌与植物病害的关系.生命科学和土壤学中几个领域的研究进展[M].北京:农业出版社,1993.202.
  • 4胡正嘉 王平.VA菌根真菌对棉花枯萎病的影响[J].土壤学报,1994,:213-213.
  • 5汪洪钢 吴观以 等.VA菌根对绿豆吸磷和固氮的影响[J].土壤学报,1983,20(2):203-208.
  • 6刘润地 李晓林.丛枝菌根及其应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2000.193.
  • 7刘杏忠 刘润进 秦志林.VAM真菌定殖于大豆胞囊线虫在我国的发现.土壤学报,1994,31:230-233.
  • 8Van Der Heijden, M G A, et al. Different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal species are potential determinants of plant community structure. Ecology, 1998, 79(6):2082~2091
  • 9Morton J B and Benny G L. Revised classification of arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi (Zygomycetes): a new order, Glomales, two new suborders, Glomineae and Gigas porineae, and two new families, Acaulosporacaceae and Gigasporaceae, with an emendation of Glomaceae. Mycotaxon, 1990,37:471~491
  • 10Littlefield I J, Willooxson R D et al. Phytopathology, 1965, 55:536-542

共引文献110

同被引文献150

引证文献4

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部