期刊文献+

减小翼型激波阻力的鼓包流动控制技术 被引量:16

Wave Drag Reduction of Airfoil with Shock Control Bump
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对2020年使用的N+2代民用飞机的翼身融合(BWB)布局发展需要,以减小激波阻力为目标,采用计算流体力学(CFD)方法,开展弱化激波、减小激波阻力的鼓包流动控制技术研究。提出了λ形激波结构"强干扰"和等熵压缩"弱干扰"两种鼓包激波减阻流动控制原理,给出了两种鼓包基本形状设计方法和工程应用的可行性分析,指出λ形激波结构鼓包更易于在工程上实现。系统研究了产生λ形激波结构的鼓包位置、高度和长度等参数对控制激波与减小波阻的影响规律,提出了鼓包参数选择原则。研究结果表明,以激波强度和位置为依据,通过鼓包参数优化匹配,可达到弱化激波、减小波阻的目的,减阻效果显著,对RAE2822和NACA0012翼型的最大减阻量分别可达到21%和12%。 In order to meet the development requirements of the blended wing body (BWB) configuration for N+ 2 generation civil transport aircraft in 2020, this paper establishes a goal of reducing the wave drag, and uses a shock control bump to weaken the shock and hence reduce the wave drag by a computational fluid dynamics(CFD) method. Bump control principles besed on strong disturbance created by the λ shock structure and weak disturbance created by infinitely quasi-isentropic shocks are put forward; the geometric design method and engineering feasibility analysis of the two different bumps are studied. The results show that the bump based on a λ shock structure can be easily realized in engineering applications. The parameters of the length, height and location of the bump which produces a λ shock structure are investigated in detail so as to find their impact on wave drag reduction and yield the principles for parameter selection. It can be concluded that the best matching of these parameters with regard to such flow conditions as shock strength and its location can realize obvious drag reduction, the results show that the maximal drag reduction can reach 21% for RAE2822 and 12% for NACA0012.
出处 《航空学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第6期971-977,共7页 Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica
关键词 鼓包 翼型 激波 减阻 流动控制 bump airfoil shock waves drag reduction flow contro
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Reneaux J. Overview on drag reduction technologies for civil transport aircraft[C] // European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Science and Engineering. 2004.
  • 2Nickol C L, McCullers L A. Hybrid wing body configuration system studies[R]. AIAA- 2009-931, 2009.
  • 3Schmitt V, Destarac D. Recent progress in drag prediction and reduction for civil transport aircraft at ONEAR[R]. AIAA 1998-0137, 1998.
  • 4Liebeck R H. Design of the blended wing body subsonic transport[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2004, 41(1):10-25.
  • 5Qin N, Vavalle A, Le Moigne A, et al. Aerodynamic con siderations of blended wing body aircraft[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2004, 40(6) :321-343.
  • 6Stanewsky E. Drag reduction by shock and boundary layer control[M]. New York:Springer-Verlag, 2002:383-413.
  • 7Ogawa H, Babinsky H, Patzold M, et al. Shock-wave/ boundary-layer interaction control using three-dimensional bumps for transonic wings[J]. AIAA Journal, 2008, 46 (6) :1442 -1452.
  • 8Jameson A, Hu R, Brown A C, et al. Aerodynamic shape optimization for the world's fastest P 51[R]. AIAA-2006-48, 2006.
  • 9Muramatsu S, Okada S, Hiraoka K. Numerical analysis of control of leading edge vortex on delta wing with blowing[R]. AIAA-2005-5088, 2005.
  • 10He C, Corke T C, Patel M P. Numerical and experimental analysis of plasma flow control over a hump model[R]. AIAA-2007-935 , 2007.

同被引文献157

引证文献16

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部