期刊文献+

论渔业配额制度的起源及其内在法律特征 被引量:5

Fishing Quota System:Its Origin and Inner Legal Characteristics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 渔业配额制度是在渔业资源过度捕捞所导致的渔业危机和传统的投入控制管理模式失效的历史背景下,基于渔业资源生态特性而构建的一种产出式的渔业管理模式。它是在总可捕量基础上发展起来的,最早雏形始见于美加间的渔业管理实践。冰岛、新西兰等主要渔业国家结合本国国情实施了不同外在形式的配额模式。该制度具有专属性、持续性、可转让性、激励性等外在法律特征。资源的特性决定了配额制度的实质内涵是一种不得超越总可捕量的共同义务。义务本位下的配额制度,其意蕴是一个管理问题,而非产权问题。产权的手段并不能根本解决渔业危机,私权的行使必须处于公权力的监管之下,配额制度才能发挥应有实效,这是配额实质给予我们的启示。 Fishing quota system refers to output fishery management mode based on ecological characteristics of fishery resources, due to overfishing crisis and malfunction of traditional control management. Based on total allowable catch, it came from the original fishery management practices between the U.S. and Canada. Iceland and New Zealand such fisheries countries adopted different quota system according to their situations. The system is exclusive, sustainable, transferable and incentive in the layer of law. Its resources attribute essentially quota solve quota decides the quota system is a common duty that cannot overpass total allowable catch. The duty-based system actually means an issue of management rather than property problem. Property methods cannot fisheries crisis, and private rights must be exercised under the supervision of public rights, and then system functions effectively. This is what quota system enlightens us.
作者 白洋
出处 《学术交流》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第6期55-58,共4页 Academic Exchange
关键词 渔业配额 外在特征 实质内涵 fisheries quotas external characteristics essential connotation
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献17

  • 1徐祥民.现代国际海洋法的实质及其给我们的启示[J].中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版),2003(4):34-39. 被引量:4
  • 2慕永通,韩立民.渔业问题及其根源剖析[J].中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版),2003(6):66-74. 被引量:33
  • 3周达军.我国海洋渔业投入产出控制政策面临问题的思考[J].管理世界,2007,23(5):150-151. 被引量:5
  • 4浙江省政协农业和农村工作委员会“关于有效控制海洋捕捞强度继续做好渔民转产转业的调研报告”:2006年3月.
  • 5[2]Neher,P.A.,R.Amason,and N.Mollett (Eds.).RightsBased Fishing [A].Dordrecht,The Nethelands: Kluwer Academic Publishers,1989.
  • 6[3]Amason,R 1999.Property rights as a means of economic organization [C].Paper presented to the FishRights99 Conference held in Western Australia,1999.
  • 7[4]斯韦托扎尔·平乔维奇著,蒋临琦译.产权经济学--一种关于比较体制的理论.北京:经济科学出版社,1999.
  • 8[5]Coase,R.H.1960.The problem of social cost [J].The Journal of Law and Economics,1960,3: 1-44.
  • 9[6]Hardin,G.1968.The tragedy of the commons [J].Science,1968,162:1243-48.
  • 10[7]Anderson,L.G.1999,Selection of a Property Rights Management System [C].Paper presented to the FishRights99Conference held in Western Australia,1999.

共引文献39

同被引文献39

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部