期刊文献+

从交互认知走向交互哲学——以加拉格尔关于现象学与涉身认知的探索为例 被引量:6

From Interaction Cognition to Interaction Philosophy: Exampling the Exploration of Phenomenology and Cognitive Science by Shaun Gallagher
原文传递
导出
摘要 现象学是理解涉身认知交互本质以及建构相应交互哲学的重要进路。当代美国哲学家肖恩.加拉格尔通过建设性地解读和利用现象学为我们探索交互认知和建构交互哲学提供了重要启示。加拉格尔从方法上廓清了一种建设性现象学的存在,建构了一种基于现象学的整体涉身性理论框架,尝试通过整体涉身性框架对认知科学研究进行了科学解释,并且透过交互主体性互动理论展示了一种可能的交互哲学。他的探索既具价值又面临挑战。 Phenomenological is the important way to understand the interaction essence of embodied cognition and to construct the interaction philosophy.Through explaining and using phenomenology actively,Shaun Gallagher has done useful works for us to explore interaction cognition and construct interaction philosophy.He discussed an active phenomenology from the methodology,concluded a holistic embodiment through phenomenology,demonstrated the idea from the development psychology and neuropathology,and displayed an impossible interaction philosophy by interaction inter-subjectivity theory.His work not only is valuable but also faces challenges.
作者 孟伟
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第6期25-29,共5页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金 教育部青年基金项目(09YJC720021) 中国博士后科研基金资助
关键词 现象学 涉身认知 交互认知 交互哲学 加拉格尔 phenomenology embodied cognition interaction cognition interaction philosophy Gallagher
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1(法)梅洛-庞蒂.知觉现象学[M].姜志辉,译.北京:商务印书馆,2001.
  • 2(德)海德格尔.存在与时间[M].陈嘉映,等译.北京:三联书店,1999.
  • 3Wheeler Michael. Reconstructing the Cognitive World[M]. Cambridge : the MIT Press, 2005.
  • 4Gallagher S. How the Body Shape the Mind[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
  • 5肖恩·加拉格尔,邓友超.解释学与认知科学[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2004,22(1):34-42. 被引量:9
  • 6Gallagher S, Jonathan Cole. Body Image and Body Schema in a Deafferented Subiect[J]. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 1995,(16) :369-390.
  • 7RAMSOY, Thomas. 2006. An Interview with Shaun Gal- lagher on How the Body Shapes the Mind[DB/OL]. http:// pegasus. ec. ucf. edu/- gallaghr/scrlnterview06. html, Sci- ence and Consciousness Review (OL iournal). 19 - Jan- 2006.

二级参考文献16

  • 1Taylor, C. (1985) Self-Interpreting Animals. In Human Agency and language: Philosophical Papers, Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 2Dilthey, W, (1926) Gesammelte Sehriften (Vol. 7). Glittingen-Smttgart: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
  • 3Gadamer, H. G. (1989) Truth and method, 2^nd. NY: Crossroad.
  • 4Habermas, J. (1988) On Hermeneutics'Claim to Universality. Trans. K. Mueller-Vollmer. In K. Mueller-Vollmer (ed,)The Hermeneutics Reader. NY: Contimum.
  • 5Ricoeur, P. (1970) Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation. Trans. D. Savage, New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • 6Abdetson, R. C. (1977) The Notion of Schemata and the Educational Enterprise. In R. C. Anderson et al. (eds.) Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • 7Lakoff, G. et al. (2003) Metaphors We Live By. 2^nd. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • 8Dreyfus, H. (1992) What Computers Still Can't Do. Cambridge, MA: MA: МГГ Press.
  • 9Gallagher, S. et al. (1999) The Self in Contextualized Action. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6 (4): 4-30.
  • 10Schleiermacher, F. (1977) Hermeneutics: The Handwritten Manuscripts. Trans. J. Duke et al, Missoula, MT: Scholars Press.

共引文献15

同被引文献57

引证文献6

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部