期刊文献+

梁结构的损伤识别方法研究

Study of Damage Detection Indictor for Beam Structure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对桥梁结构多为简支梁和连续梁的形式,文章使用了柔度差法对梁结构的损伤识别进行了研究。文章首先分别推导了一阶振型变化率和柔度差的识别理论;然后使用ansys有限元分析软件对简支梁和连续梁进行了损伤数值模拟,并使用此两种识别指标进行损伤识别;最后比较了两种指标的识别效果。文章还对梁结构的多处损伤进行了研究。结果表明:对于梁结构柔度差法的损伤识别效果优于一阶振型变化率,且同样仅需少数的前几阶模态数据。 For the case of simple beam and continuous beam always being seen in bridge, in this paper method of difference of flexibility is used to detect damage o fbeam structure. At first, the author deduces the theory o fchange rate of the first mode shape and difference of flexibility for damage detection. Then, ANSYS, a Finite Element Analysis Software are used to simulate structural damage of simple beam and continuous beam. The two above damage indictors be used to locate the location of damage inbeam. At last, the results of damage detection are compared. In the paper, case of several damage of beam at the same time is studied. The result shows that for damage detection of beam the method of difference of flexibility is better than change rate of the first mode shape. In addition to, only few first mode data is need for damage detection.
作者 何云
出处 《工程建设与设计》 2011年第6期146-149,共4页 Construction & Design for Engineering
关键词 柔度差 损伤识别 简支梁 连续梁 一阶振型变化率 difference of flexibility damage detection simple beam continuous beam change rate of the firstmode shape
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献20

  • 1陈建林,郭杏林.基于神经网络的简支梁损伤检测研究[J].烟台大学学报(自然科学与工程版),2001,14(3):217-223. 被引量:19
  • 2黄振平 杨学山.桥梁挠度的新仪器--QY倾角仪.结构强度、振动、测试、理论与应用学术会议论文集[M].,1992.191-197.
  • 3杨山 马树林 等..新型桥梁静、动挠度测量系统的实验及结果分析[M].中国地震局工程力学研究所,2001,11..
  • 4Lieven N A, Ewins D J. Spatial correlation of mode shapes,the co-ordinate modal assurance criterion (COMAC)[A].In: Proceedings of the 6^th International Modal Analysis Conference 1[C].NewYork: Union College Schenectady,NY12308, Society for experiment mechanics, INC, 1988.690 - 695.
  • 5Salawn O S, Williams A. Damage location using vibration mode shapes[A]. In : Proceedings of the 12^th International Modal Analysis Conference[C]. NewYork: Union College Schenectady, NY12308, Society for experiment mechanics,INC, 1994. 933-939.
  • 6Adams R D, Walton D, Flitcroft J E, et al. Vibration and nondestructive test tool for composite materials[J]. Composite Reliability, 1975,ASTM STP 580: 159- 175.
  • 7Cawley, Adams R D. The location of defects in structures from measurements of the natural frequencies[J]. Journal of Strain Analysis, 1979,14(2) : 49-57.
  • 8Wolff T, Richardson M. Fault detection in structures from changes in their modal parameters[A]. In: Proceedings of the 7^th International Modal Analysis Conference 1[C].NewYork: Union College Schenectady, NY12308, Society for experiment mechanics, INC, 1989. 87-94.
  • 9P J Comwell, M Kam, B Carlson, et al. Comparative study of vibration-based damage id algorithms [A]. Proc of 16th International Modal Analysis Conference[C]. Bethel, CT, USA, 1998. 1710-1716.
  • 10M I FrisweU, John E T Penny, The practical limits of damage detection and location using vibration data [A], 11th VPI&SU symposium on structural dynamics and control[C]. Blaeksburg, Virginia, USA: VPI & SU, 1997. 31-40.

共引文献238

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部